By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Would you quit Modern Gaming if its Digital Only?

 

Would you quite Modern Gaming if its Digital Only?

yes 197 44.57%
 
no 245 55.43%
 
Total:442

I already game pretty much Digital Only. And with Australia's stone-age internet, that's saying something!
That said, going digital only would be a stupid move. Plenty of places who won't be able to get games if it can't ship them in physically. And I still remember the nice feeling of coming home with fresh shiny boxed copy of that game you've been waiting for. I'll get a PS4 eventually and I'll probably buy physical games for that.



Around the Network
JOKA_ said:
Shadow1980 said:

Whoa thanks for the thorough response.  I agree that some of my points were thin (theft), and I do think there is some risk because its not guaranteed that these services will be around forever.  As a counter point, I do want to mention data rot for physical media: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_degradation#Decay_of_storage_media Its entirely possible that in 20 or 30 years those collections of discs won't work anymore. 


I'm just going to mainly focus on the last part:

Of course I miss being a kid, leaving GameStop with a fresh new game, reading the manual on the way home.  But progress marches on, and I don't think those times are coming back (definitely not the manual part ha).  I'm not saying that I WANT physical media to go away, I just see it as an inevitablilty.  I'm totally cool with both co-existing....I just don't see it happening.  And to go back to the OP's question, it seems silly (imo) to stop doing a hobby because the delivery method changed.

It's also entirely possible that in 30 years, your computer's operating system will no longer be compatible with the copies of your games as well,putting you in the same boat. A copy of Metal Gear for the MSX2 isn't going to natively run on your current Windows 10 machine even if you have a digital copy.



FallingTitan said:
I like digital because it lasts forever. You just log into your account on your xbox 100 and you have your games from xbox one with backwards cap.


while physical disc's can get:
- scratched,
- fractured*my dam assassin creed syndicate got fractured by taking it out of box!!!!* and
- lost
- stolen.

Physical media can outlast the company that created it. Many of my 360 purchases can't even make the jump to the XBO...



Retro Tech Select - My Youtube channel. Covers throwback consumer electronics with a focus on "vid'ya games."

Latest Video: Top 12: Best Games on the N64 - Special Features, Episode 7

The Fury said:
Zappykins said:

Sure there are a few records, but most all music and movies is all digital now. Games are doing the same. It was 50/50 this year for consoles over the Black Friday weekend (in the states). I see 2015 as the last year that physical lead. It's already lost PC, now consoles will be mostly digital.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/4/15/8419567/digital-physical-music-sales-overtake-globally

Only last year. iTunes was created 15 years ago. Games are having a harder time selling the idea of 'digital only', just like movies are. We've got a while yet of discs, espcially as most the time, games are bought by parents for kids.

That's off revenue, not volume.  And itunes is just one way of getting them.

Plus, like I said, if you don't have good internet you might want physical.  But even so, you can still get a model T if you want.

 



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!

Zappykins said:

That's off revenue, not volume.  And itunes is just one way of getting them.

Plus, like I said, if you don't have good internet you might want physical.  But even so, you can still get a model T if you want.

You missed the point because you were set on trying to make out that people who like to collect physical games are behind the times while the fact that your example was a Model T Ford which no doubt most people here would love to own so they could just say they own it, doesn't mean they'd use it every day and all probably own a safe reliable Japanese car anyway.

And so what if it's revenue vs volume? It was last year, 2015, that revenue finally passed CD sales. The point of that was the date. As long as the revenue gained from selling non-digital releases of games remains so high, publishers will always release a disc version.

Many people here have mentioned why digital just isn't quite there yet, doesn't mean we are behind the times. We just don't see it as acompletely viable option just yet.



Hmm, pie.

Around the Network

Still wouldn't make a difference. Physical media makes more relevance in areas without 4G or FTTH. One of the most bizzare things that could happen is your HDD turning up corrupt at an unexpected hour making all your digital downloads a waste of time. 



Shadow1980 said:



I can guarantee you one thing: If any one of the Big Three try to pull the trigger all-digital come next generation, they're going to end up like Sega, making games for the competition.

Oh god I definitely don't think it would happen next gen, probably not even the gen after that.  Heck probably not even 3 gens from now.  But eventually? Yeah. 

I'm going off my gut, and you've done way more research than me, so I'm going to back away slowly.



Platinums: Red Dead Redemption, Killzone 2, LittleBigPlanet, Terminator Salvation, Uncharted 1, inFamous Second Son, Rocket League

You people aren't investing. You're consuming entertainment. Investment has a very real definition, and you should distinctly separate it from consumption.



StarOcean said:
Wright said:
StarOcean said:

I actually am OCD XD I cannot tell you how tempted I've been to buy a second Vita just so a can have one with my physical games and some with my digital games :P



 

If it makes you feel better, I've re-bought games just because the box or the disc got a small, tiny scratch. I've managed to overcome this OCD, but it still triggers my inner fears whenever I spot one in a game. xD

Ive had that problem! It mainly stemmed from my used FFX disc. The game played perfect until midway through and then the disc wouldnt let me go any further without the game going completely black and crashing. Ever since, Ive been super cautious about discs x.x



Lol you guys think that's bad? i refuse to buy Ass Creed 1 & Valkyria Chronicles because the only retail versions have that ugly "playstation 3" batman font on the side of the box.

 

Played both on my PC digitally though.



potato_hamster said:
Azzanation said:
potato_hamster said:
Azzanation said:
potato_hamster said:
Azzanation said:
Lauster said:
Azzanation said:
Lauster said:
Azzanation said:
My simple question to those who would is "Do you play the game or the Box?*
Google what a video game is and what its meant to do and you will find your anwser there.

 My simple question to you is "Do you prefer to buy a product, or a service that you don't control ?"

 If your Steam account is closed (for whatever reason, like not accepting a new EULA for example) you loose all your games.

Note : link redirect to a french site, so there is this that is not the same story but seems to have the same result.

Iv had my Steam account since 2004, it has been more relyable then any console purchase i have made. All my games are playable today with free updates in 2016.

Look at the benefits

My games cant get lost, Stolen, Damaged, my home storage space increases, i dont have to put the disk in the machine to play it, and i can go anywhere around the world and not have to worry about taking my games with me.

Disadvantages

That assumption electricity no longer exists.

Sorry but iv been collecting games since the 80s. I have no room or the patients with phyical games anymore. Its no longer needed.

I game because i want entertainment,  not so i can look at a box on my shelf knowing that its mine forever when in fact even phyical copy of games can still be taken away. I own many CD based games that no longer have support though a server. What if Live or PSN go down and you own 500 phyical games and you need a day one patch?

Exacty.

 Cool story bro, but you miss the point if you think that people that doesn't want the digital-only  is just for a "look at a box on my shelf" purpose.

I collect games since the 80s too, still not a problem for me, but I can understand your point about the space occupied.

I wish you to never have problem with the society of the man on your avatar.

In your 500 physical games, lets say there are  only 20 that are unplayable without their day one patch ? Still better to have 480 games playable than none if your Steam account is closed, isn't it ?

Exactly.

But it's more a DRM problem than a digital problem.

                               

There is no argument, Digital is a far more superiour way to buy and play your games. I have had more console and disk problems with my games then i ever did with digital. Your basing your argument around "What if Steam shuts down" lol honestly you really think they will shut down? If you were right another company will pick it up and continue it. Its a major cash grab.

Your next gen console relies on the internet, most of your games require internet to play and to download the day one patches. Without PSN or Live your console is a sitting brick.

Have you notice that the game box you have has nothing in it? The console only needs the disk to prove you purchased it becasue the stupid gaming community we have today hated on DRM so now we are forced to put a plastic disk in the plastic box to give the tick of approval. Buying phyiscal is a complete waste of resources and the sooner we go 100% digital the sooner we will have Steam priced games. The longer companies have to supply disks the more we will pay for digital because they want to sell you the disks first becasue again "Stupid community" 

Its not like the past where you can look at your N64 collection and go "I own those games" espeacilly with the formats we game on today its only a cover nothing else. I dont even think my PS1 or NES even work today due to there age, so i have 500+ unplayable games because i have no other way to play them. But you would rather that then have a service that looks after your games for you. Imagine you have a house fire? You lose all your games, but if you have them online there untouchable and always ready to download.

Digital is also the best form of backwards compatiablity, you dont need to own multiple types of hardware and to hope to god your old consoles still work or worse, hoping the disks/cartridges still read.

Sure you cant sell digital but you can always sell your account. I personally dont buy games to sell them.

Theres so much wrong with this post I don't even know where to begin. Steam has steam prices because steam has competition - Amazon, gog, humble, origin etc. all over the exact same games that can be played on the same piece of hardware. Sony has no competition in the marketplace for PS4 games. MS has no competition in the marketplace for X1 games. You're not going to see steam-style prices so long as there is only an MS marketplace on your xbox to buy xbox games. They have no reason to.

Your PS1 and N64 games should work just fine if you took care of them. I still play my PS1 and dreamcast games all the time, and some of those games are 18 years old. Why wouldn't they work? People are still playing their NES games from 1985.

As for backwards compatibility, just try getting the original GTA working on Windows 10. Tell me how much fun of an experience that is if you get it to work as its supposed to.



*Your PS1 and N64 games should work just fine if you took care of them. *

Digital you dont have to take care of them. Not everyone lives in a perfect enviroment, people have lost there belongings or even there houses. What happens then? Do you get a refund on all your games you lost to your house fire? No, can you redownload them if there digital? Yes.

I own Vice City, San Andreas, Liberty City, 3, 4 and 5 on Steam and they all work perfectly fine on my 55inch TV in full screen... i didnt even need to buy a remastered edition to play it in full.  

Hardware doesnt last forever , any body could tell you that, unless you have it sealed in an air tight, dust free Nasa storage room its going to not work one day. Same goes for disks and formats.

There are no benefits anymore having the games on disks, infact you get more disadvatages having it on disk then digital. The sooner the gaming community move on the better the industry becomes.



 

There are plenty of advantages to havings games on discs. Being able to re-sell them being a major one, being able to lend them to friends and family being another. Owning a copy of something that may in fact increase in price over time is yet another. Nevermind whatever value there is in having a game on your shelf rather than a hard drive if you see any in that.

You might not see those benefits as important to you, but that doesn't mean they're not important to others. In fact they might be important to the majority of console gamers.

Those benefits dont benefit the gamer who wants to play games. Your talking on those who want to collect or sell games. I went into a games shop wanting to trade in my Darks Souls 2 Collectors games, they offered me $17 for a perfect condition game.. stuff that, its worth keeping. I am a gamer who plays games not cares how much im going to get back when i sell it.

I would rather prefer to go home from work to see my collection of games still playable and accessable then to come home to games that dont work anymore or lost/stolen.

The benefits i care about are those that benefit the point of video games. If your a collector then go collect something else, if you just like looking at the box then go read and buy books. Video games are meant to be played not stored and resold. If your friends dont own the game, tell them to get a job and buy it, if its worth sharing then its worth buying. If your family cant play it, log into your account and give them the controller.

Its so simply its not even an argument anymore.

Ohh right, because gamers who want to collect games, don't also want to play them, and I mean, it's not like a lot of people out there sell or trade in their games once they're done with them so they can buy more games to play! They're just in it for collecting right?

It's just as easy to see your collection of games still playable and accessable with hard copies vs. digital. Try downloading a game you don't already have installed off of steam if their servers are down, or your internet is down, for example. But nothing is going to stop me from booting up Driver for my PS1 except for the unlikely event my PS1, PS2 and PS3 all break. You're just as vulerable to incidences beyond your control affecting the playability of your game collection, you're just trading one set of risks for different, arguably more sinister set of risks.

In your eyes, video games are solely meant to be played, and not stored or resold. But that's just you. That's not an objective fact, that's just your opinion, and it's not even an opinion commonly shared amonst console video gamers. I also think it's wonderful that yout thought-process dismissing the value of owning hard copies involves literally getting another hobby, or being a jerk to your friends or family. Not everyone shares your point of view. In fact, the all of the controversey surrounding the launch of the X1 shows that you and people that share your opinion are still part of tiny minority.

So you're just gonna have to deal with it.



I dont have to deal with anything. Its those who refuse change are the ones that have to deal with it. Digital is a thing and its growing rapidly. Those who dont like it can stop playing games. Becaucse if they played the games they wouldnt care about the change.

 

Theres a bigger and better world out there. Living in the past does not help the future. Like they say, people are afraid of change.