This game combined with the last Batman Arkhan something show that coding for consoles =/= coding for PC. Sure, it can be well seen in graphically acomplished console games (usually the exclusives). And 30 FPS is a choice - but ofcourse as usual, I'm wasting my breadth.

OT: Drop to 0FPS? That's a big oversight, or rather, compromise to accept. I doubt QA didn't see it, unless there's some specific, elusive collection of conditions that were replicated on both Xbones in this test (not likely). The bug must be on the list for the first patch. 

Yeah it's pretty weird the freezes, but like they said in the full article, it basically happens at set points or if you've not used the model or sfx of a gun/grenade in some time the game just unloads the cached model and effects from memory, given that the bug is repeatable and FO5 is such a massive title I'm sure it'll be patched a lot over the next few months.

That stuttering...

I think u need to be specific what kind of PC spec that can run the games at ultra, 4k, full Anti aliasing, while maintaining 60 fps?

Where did you get 'ultra, 4k, full Anti aliasing' from? :p

Jesus Bethesda, "it just works"...

I wouldnt say consoles have done better, There is no other game like Fallout 4 on consoles that have proven this. Sure games can look good but Fallout 4 is another genre that struggles to run at a next gen standard. Its not the Devs fault the game cant hit 60 frames or have alot more detail and effects, as we have seen with the PC version. Hardware is a limitation. Remember theres more to a game than the visuals that eat up processing power, like AI, number of enermies, FOV, Vsync, AA, AF and many other things.

As we have seen with many ports that are heavily optimised that the differences between the 2 consoles is a bare minimum. Look at the heavily optimised games like The Witcher 3 for example or Destiny. When companies start using the strenghts of both consoles and not just the strenght of one and not the other, you wont notice much difference.

As for Fallout 4, sure it doesnt look as good as Ryse or Killzone but Fallout is doing things those games dont do instead. The perfect example is Driveclub vs Forza Horizon 2, sure one game looks better because its more linear and track focused while the other focuses on other things like open world etc. That processing power doesnt change between games, its all the same for every game, its just where they decide to use it. Halo 5 focused on frame rate, if they wanted to, they could have made it look like a tech demo if they chose 30 frames.  

I'll be picking up on PC in a month or two.

0 frames per second are you kidding me? Oh well I'll pick this up in a few months on PC. Have way to many games to lined up right now. All of them being 30+ hour games.

well i could have  just mention, 60 fps, with low setting, 640p and no anti aliasing, , it doesn't matter,  the post is misleading. i cannot even play Fallout 4 on my old PC  intel pentium mmx