But it is an opinion that can be debated upon, even if it is vague. Wouldn't you agree with that? I mean, yeah, some people jumped at Miyamoto's throat even before entering the thread, but all statements are subject of debate.

Miyamoto has a warped preception of what the gameing market looks like right now..... he needs to buy a xbox one and a PS4 and try some of their games, get his fingers on the pulse of the market again, because it sounds like hes lost his touch, on where gameing is at.

Those are pointless because when there's ambiguity like this, people start filling in the holes themselves as opposed to allowing Miyamoto to do it.

Thats very inaccurate, i would be a here for hours if i had to explain all the reasons thats not true

Cartoony games look different to cartoony games.
Realistic games look different to realistic games.
Cartoony games look different to realistic games.

/thread

I don't agree. I have realism if I go out on the streets. I use entertainment to experience something different. And I really liked Borderlands, Monster Hunter and Rayman Legends a lot more than Tomb Raider, GTA V and Splinter Cell: Blacklist to name some games I played the past year or so.

Way to go, everyone. We made a dirt mount pile up into a hill. Let's dissect more of what he said and turn it into a mountain. That way we may look down at the father of modern gaming and shame him for an opinion that is valid and deserving to be stated. A+

I only bolded and underlined something in the posts... for whatever reason.

There are cartoony games with great graphics. Broken Age, Ni No Kuni, Rayman Origins/Legends, R&C, Mario Galaxy, etc.

And there are cartoony games with horrendous, shitty graphics like Star Fox.

The same can be said about games trying to achieve realistic graphics.

Well, I wouldn't put Starfox under very cartoony, so that alone brings up the question how cartoony and realistic is defined.