By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Disinformation Agents Have Overtaken VGCHARTZ (Nintendo Related)

These are not lies. They are rumors. They are as much of a lie as you saying they are not true.



Around the Network
Tachikoma said:

Theres a difference between a realistic and plausible theory based off of varying factors and a complete fabrication.
People are coming up with these theories based on real world events, Nintendos actions and various key signifiers.

We had a sparse e3 direct where Nintendo went out of their way to repeatedly focus on the idea that Nintendo was transforming, they even mentioned NX in the direct, if it was far enough off that we could expect a few more years worth of WiiU titles there would have been zero reason to mention NX, but they did.

Also, a theory isn't a lie if the person that shares that theory believes it, far fetched? maybe, Plausible? depends, but a lie? not really.

When you give an example of iwara planning to harvest organs, you write that knowing full well that theres nothing to back it up and you yourself do not believe it to be true, thus it's a lie, however if you truly believed that iwata was harvesting organs, until it could be varifiably disproved it would not be a lie, it would be your belief / theory.

Take religion as an example, Millions of people follow religion because it's what they have chosen to believe, even when said religion lacks physical evidence to support it, would you in that situation, call the people following these religions liars?

You're right to a degree, but only to a degree. I also believe the OP went too far by calling the theorists "liars," because I believe some of the people spouting the theories genuinely (though not necessarily reasonably) believe their statements might be true.

However, the OP is correct in calling these unsupported theories "misinformation," because at the end of the day that's exactly what it is. After all, when a person puts forth a statement it is up to that perso to provide the factual support for it.

There is, literally, no evidence to support the first two statements identified in the OP.* There are logical assumptions - in this case, often leaps really - that some people are making to jump to those conclusions. They don't even rise to the level of rumors: they're suppositions cobbled together from select information, and they should be treated accordingly. Notwithstanding this reality, there appear to be folks going around spreading these assumptions like they're gospel.

In that respect, I feel comfortable siding with the OP, and took exception to holding him to a higher standard of proof than the rumormongers. After all, he is simply calling out people who are dressing supposition as fact: before I demand that he prove his case, it is both fair and logical to insist that the people making the original claims submit some proof for their claims, no?

 

*I, at least, have not seen or heard of any, nor have I heard whispers that the evidence is available somewhere.



Kowan said:
These are not lies. They are rumors. They are as much of a lie as you saying they are not true.

i edited the thread maybe its now more clear.



Tsubasa Ozora

Keiner kann ihn bremsen, keiner macht ihm was vor. Immer der richtige Schuss, immer zur richtigen Zeit. Superfussball, Fairer Fussball. Er ist unser Torschützenkönig und Held.

I would choose the words hyperboles/easy conclusions instead of lies!:P I don't disagree with the thread though!:P



i am one of them.
Seriously i am really not that into nintendo to care but ever since they delayed zelda U for next year it became so clear to me.



Around the Network

I don't really get why Nintendo fans on this board are so terrified of new hardware.

The Wii U and 3DS are nothing special, the sooner they are replaced the better.

This is nothing like the Sega situation at all where they released 32X and Saturn 8 months within each other too, OK so stop citing that as an example, especially the 15 year olds here who don't really know anything about that era. 

The XBox 360 and Nintendo DS are the best selling Microsoft and Nintendo game hardware systems and they were both preceeded by system's with shorter lifecycles and that didn't impact them. 



Will you open a thread next year calling yourself a liar if everything pointed in the OP occurs?



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


noname2200 said:

You're right to a degree, but only to a degree. I also believe the OP went too far by calling the theorists "liars," because I believe some of the people spouting the theories genuinely (though not necessarily reasonably) believe their statements might be true.

However, the OP is correct in calling these unsupported theories "misinformation," because at the end of the day that's exactly what it is. After all, when a person puts forth a statement it is up to that perso to provide the factual support for it.

There is, literally, no evidence to support the first two statements identified in the OP.* There are logical assumptions - in this case, often leaps really - that some people are making to jump to those conclusions. They don't even rise to the level of rumors: they're suppositions cobbled together from select information, and they should be treated accordingly. Notwithstanding this reality, there appear to be folks going around spreading these assumptions like they're gospel.

In that respect, I feel comfortable siding with the OP, and took exception to holding him to a higher standard of proof than the rumormongers. After all, he is simply calling out people who are dressing supposition as fact: before I demand that he prove his case, it is both fair and logical to insist that the people making the original claims submit some proof for their claims, no?

 

*I, at least, have not seen or heard of any, nor have I heard whispers that the evidence is available somewhere.

My issue was with the labeling of "lies" not the actual claims or statements being made, nor about it being misinformation.

Additionally, the people making these claims are for the most part, not claiming it to be fact, to call something a lie is an absolute, in order to issue an absolute you need to be able to demonstrate why that's the case, the op doesnt and thus the absolute holds no meaning, and is in itself, misinformation.

In the same way claiming something is a fact, is an absolute, If someone were to say "it's a fact that NX will release in 2016", I would say the same thing to them, "without proof it isn't a fact".



Pavolink said:
Will you open a thread next year calling yourself a liar if everything pointed in the OP occurs?


If he gets refuted,yes he will make it,because he has the guts to admit it!I wonder about the others of the opposite side if will do the same if they get refuted...

They seem so certain,so such a miss would be painful!



Tachikoma said:
kljesta64 said:

Beware of those who disinform and claim Nintendo will release a new consoles in 2016. It's a lie.

Beware of those who say Zelda U is cross gen and it will release on Nintendos new console and Wii U. It's a lie. 

Beware of those who say Nintendo has abandoned Wii U and is already developing games for their next console. It's a lie.

No offence but you cannot prove that these theories are untrue, just as they cannot prove their own theories are true, so labeling them liars seems a little pointless.

Can you, beyond a shadow of doubt prove that Nintendo will not release a new console/console in 2016, that Zelda U won't be cross gen, or that Nintendo are planning on winding down support for the WiiU? because if you can't, you really shouldn't be calling peoples theories lies.

You are the only sane member on this forum it seems.