By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Angry Joe Vargas Pulls Mario Party 10 WHY ?

This guy is full spectrum



#1 Amb-ass-ador

Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:
onionberry said:


That's how it goes, in the meantime I'll enjoy his purity

Thats purity? LOL. Cool. As for Joe....he doesn't always make an ass of himself. He has issues with principle and he tends not to back down. He had the same issue with the Xbox One DRM issue and he's a vocal hater of EA (because of their nickel and diming of the consumer). The role Joe tends to play is that of an advocate for consumer rights when it comes to corporations. If I was him i'd take the hit (this once) from Nintendo and let them dig into my Nintendo content revenue so he can increase his base. Can't screw with copyright holders. He should decrease the amount of attention that he gives to the Nintendo content to save time so he can focus on the other consoles, because despite the fact that people don't like it...its his livelyhood the revenue would come back to him.

I really don't hate joe and I don't have a problem with his pov about Nintendo, I just despise when youtubers use their "poor me" act. He's a brand, just like Nintendo. What if Nintendo develops an angry joe game without his permission... exactly. Not the same, but just an example.



onionberry said:
McDonaldsGuy said:
I was about to go off on that guy but he's got some pretty cool stuff (AOD poster, Spawn action figures, etc. etc.). He needs to calm down though, I can't listen to him.


he's acting tho, the message is real but the method is not.


I know, but he'd be tolerable if he acted a bit less crazy and loud. It's hard to even understand what he's saying.



onionberry said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Thats purity? LOL. Cool. As for Joe....he doesn't always make an ass of himself. He has issues with principle and he tends not to back down. He had the same issue with the Xbox One DRM issue and he's a vocal hater of EA (because of their nickel and diming of the consumer). The role Joe tends to play is that of an advocate for consumer rights when it comes to corporations. If I was him i'd take the hit (this once) from Nintendo and let them dig into my Nintendo content revenue so he can increase his base. Can't screw with copyright holders. He should decrease the amount of attention that he gives to the Nintendo content to save time so he can focus on the other consoles, because despite the fact that people don't like it...its his livelyhood the revenue would come back to him.

I really don't hate joe and I don't have a problem with his pov about Nintendo, I just despise when youtubers use their "poor me" act. He's a brand, just like Nintendo. What if Nintendo develops an angry joe game without his permission... exactly. Not the same, but just an example.


If Joe was using the poor me attitude I would've written him off. I'm not into that ish. He is also notoriously bad at FPS and TPS which irks me to all hell, but outside of that his reviews from a principle standard are very good. Watching him game on any console is paintful outside of the PC platform.



onionberry said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Thats purity? LOL. Cool. As for Joe....he doesn't always make an ass of himself. He has issues with principle and he tends not to back down. He had the same issue with the Xbox One DRM issue and he's a vocal hater of EA (because of their nickel and diming of the consumer). The role Joe tends to play is that of an advocate for consumer rights when it comes to corporations. If I was him i'd take the hit (this once) from Nintendo and let them dig into my Nintendo content revenue so he can increase his base. Can't screw with copyright holders. He should decrease the amount of attention that he gives to the Nintendo content to save time so he can focus on the other consoles, because despite the fact that people don't like it...its his livelyhood the revenue would come back to him.

I really don't hate joe and I don't have a problem with his pov about Nintendo, I just despise when youtubers use their "poor me" act. He's a brand, just like Nintendo. What if Nintendo develops an angry joe game without his permission... exactly. Not the same, but just an example.


The thing is is that gaming has changed. Nintendo still thinks it's 1996. YouTubers are going to play games no matter what. At least Nintendo should be reasonable.



Around the Network

Maybe this dude should learn the word relevant before he makes his next video



Can I just ask and not get blasted for it? Well, wtf is the big f'ing deal? I mean, nintendo's policies, wtf is the big issue for the people? People, the mass consumer. I mean, does this affect gamers by a lot, or just youtubers? Does Nintendo not become Nintendo business as usual because of their youtube policy and we're paying more for the games, is that what's happening? I hear people saying that Nintendo can profit more by letting youtubers put their IP in their videos and so = Sales? I mean really, who here on this thread site makes videogame videos anyways? This seems to me more like building ramps and painting handicap next to the store parking lots. This affects like only the 0.001%. Why is this a point of anger for people? ANd please don't bs us by saying you're an inspiring youtuber. There are other topics in the world, you don't need to cover Nintendo.



Hahahah lmao xD I couldn't agree more with this guy. his fanbase or people who take angry joe serious should maybe think again how things REALLY are. The thing about the youtubers living in their own world couldnt be more correct. 



Angelus said:
Maybe this dude should learn the word relevant before he makes his next video

I think he needs to call Kid's-help-line



#1 Amb-ass-ador

Yeah I never understand the stupidity of people siding with these idiots against Nintendo for what they have every right to.



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(