By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Angry Joe Vargas Pulls Mario Party 10 WHY ?

97alexk on 05 April 2015
ReimTime said:
97alexk said:


i was saying how really things are about the youtube partners program, okay lets say this. If i would upload a video  about my reactin to videos angry joe has done. Like i just say some funny things and i get alot of viewers and start getting money from it. I start getting money for reacting to angry joe videos, dont you think he would pull that down? I would think so, if you think otherwise then thats wrong. Lets say you were a big youtuber and i take your videos and make money out of them, i think you wouldnt like that, someone else earning alot of money for your hardmaking youtube videos, and thats eaxctly how things are. If its otherwise, pls explain, but to me its the exact same reason, and thats where gaming youtubers come in like angry joe and nintendo who complain about nintendo making these discussions because they cant earn a quick buck from their games, they live in their own little fantasy worl where they complain where everything doesnt go there way, and stop with the advertise things. its not at all like that, because then if i would steal someones youtube videos its also supposedly be advertisement for that youtuber, but he wouldnt like me to steal his videos anyway. So thats how things are, and because you take joe seriously about this topic then maybe you should rethink


naaah m8 people are allowed to have different opinions. I don't have to rethink anything. Nintendo has every right to do this, but that doesn't mean that Joe and I have to agree with it. Joe said he enjoyed the Nintendo games. I LOVE Nintendo games. But I realize that it is very important to be able to criticize even the things I love. Joe is more affected by this than you and I are, yet he is not allowed to share his opinion on the matter? I'm not going to try and push my views on you but saying I am misguided because I disasgree with a corporation's practices................


No no, i dont think critizing is wrong at all, but it may come out as really self pretentious in my point of view.



Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. on 05 April 2015
Roma said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:


No one is questioning Nintendos right to censor their own copyrighted property and take ad revenue from people. The problem is  that their right is going to begin to step on territory where gamers who entertain people on Youtube live. They don't what prominent Youtubers are doing as free publicity (Like EA, Sony, MS and others), but people just have to learn to respect it. People have to get used to the fact that when you're dealing with Nintendo you're dealing with a dictatorship.

lol dictatorship? they are sharing the revenue that is better than not allowing you to do anything at all which would have been dictatorship. They are being fair and any fair youtuber or gamer would see it as fair


Nintendo has always  been a dictatorship  historically, which is why compared to their competition  they look like and island unto themselves . They tried to censor you tubers a couple years ago. Mind you Nintendo is the only company who sees this as encroaching  on their terrirtory. The only company. They don't need the money, they are just trying to control people or discourage them.



bunchanumbers on 05 April 2015
thismeintiel said:
bunchanumbers said:
Ruler said:
Joe wants money thats all there is


That's all it boils down to. He is protecting his bottom dollar yet he is screaming at Nintendo for trying to protect theirs. Its the ultimate in hypocrisy. There is no noble purpose like he claims.

They aren't protecting anything.  They just want 100% control of what goes out on the internet about their games.  Let's see, Sony gave people a button to share their games freely.  Nintendo demands you join some stupid partnership to allow your vids to stay up.  Which company is benefiting the most from their policies towards gamers?  Here's a hint.  It sure as hell ain't Nintendo.  And if you people continue to blindly stick up for them, especially when it's a poor policy, the NX will be a Wii U 2.


If you mean a fantastic system with wonderful first party support.... then sign me up.



Angelv577 on 05 April 2015
thismeintiel said:
bunchanumbers said:
Ruler said:
Joe wants money thats all there is


That's all it boils down to. He is protecting his bottom dollar yet he is screaming at Nintendo for trying to protect theirs. Its the ultimate in hypocrisy. There is no noble purpose like he claims.

They aren't protecting anything.  They just want 100% control of what goes out on the internet about their games.  Let's see, Sony gave people a button to share their games freely.  Nintendo demands you join some stupid partnership to allow your vids to stay up.  Which company is benefiting the most from their policies towards gamers?  Here's a hint.  It sure as hell ain't Nintendo.  And if you people continue to blindly stick up for them, especially when it's a poor policy, the NX will be a Wii U 2.

This



thismeintiel on 05 April 2015
bunchanumbers said:
thismeintiel said:
bunchanumbers said:


That's all it boils down to. He is protecting his bottom dollar yet he is screaming at Nintendo for trying to protect theirs. Its the ultimate in hypocrisy. There is no noble purpose like he claims.

They aren't protecting anything.  They just want 100% control of what goes out on the internet about their games.  Let's see, Sony gave people a button to share their games freely.  Nintendo demands you join some stupid partnership to allow your vids to stay up.  Which company is benefiting the most from their policies towards gamers?  Here's a hint.  It sure as hell ain't Nintendo.  And if you people continue to blindly stick up for them, especially when it's a poor policy, the NX will be a Wii U 2.


If you mean a fantastic system with wonderful first party support.... then sign me up.

Yep.  You and maybe 10M-15M more people, and with losses for the first year or so.  If that's what you want the future of Nintendo to be, then by all means, continue supporting them as they currently are.



 

Around the Network
bunchanumbers on 05 April 2015
thismeintiel said:
bunchanumbers said:
thismeintiel said:
bunchanumbers said:


That's all it boils down to. He is protecting his bottom dollar yet he is screaming at Nintendo for trying to protect theirs. Its the ultimate in hypocrisy. There is no noble purpose like he claims.

They aren't protecting anything.  They just want 100% control of what goes out on the internet about their games.  Let's see, Sony gave people a button to share their games freely.  Nintendo demands you join some stupid partnership to allow your vids to stay up.  Which company is benefiting the most from their policies towards gamers?  Here's a hint.  It sure as hell ain't Nintendo.  And if you people continue to blindly stick up for them, especially when it's a poor policy, the NX will be a Wii U 2.


If you mean a fantastic system with wonderful first party support.... then sign me up.

Yep.  You and maybe 10M-15M more people, and with losses for the first year or so.  If that's what you want the future of Nintendo to be, then by all means, continue supporting them as they currently are.


Don't know why you would see a great system that uses little power and still has some of the best games in a generation as bad. Why wouldn't you support that? And what do you get if you don't support it? You get Sega.