You forgot Bravely Default. :P

Hilarious. A winner of an argument doesn't ever say he/she won the argument. And I think you're blowing things out of proportion. I think most people do consider the Vita to been a "failure" or whatever word you want to use. People say the same thing about the Wii U as they do about the Vita. "I love my _____, but it's doing very poorly". It's pretty hard to say that either one has been a success.

So you don't like that people hate a thing you like. And now you are encouraging people to hate something that other people like but you don't instead.

Classy.

Also, Why does it seem like everyone who loves the Wii U is in denial about its failure and say the Vita is the only failure?

Not to put down your thread, but it has been mentioned a few times on previous threads on both sides. (I did one talking about the Vita's problem : X ) And not many people, especially fans of the consoles, want to talk about it anymore. Many people have accepted that both systems are rather poor, perhaps even failures. Continuing to bring it up just adds salt to the wound. But I do understand your feelings on the matter ; )

Regarding the Q, I think the Wii U will pass the Vita in time, but in the end, I think the Vita will pass the Wii U, due to Sony's overall longevity of their consoles. All their systems sold long after their times were passed, while Ninten consoles are retired when the new console is out. I feel this will happen between Vita and Wii U.

Maybe youre newer and missed it but when I joined I only ever saw Vita doom threads and they still pop up. Vita owners have accepted the console is niche and will stay that way. Wii U has a little more promise and hope left, so doom and gloom will continue until either people get tired of making fun of the Wii U or another system is announced and sells below users often high expectations

Wii U. Its still getting supported and good games are coming to the system more regularly, although i'm not saying the Vita is bad, but the support isn't great and is really only relying on those niche titles it has.

Ok. I'm not impressed that you posted the biggest games on the 3DS as a reply to a post that says it's unfair to compare culturally significant and memorable console games to a handheld. Or is this now a reply to Dr.Vita's post that says "Playstation Vita has as much good games as the Wii U has"? As if to ask him which games on Vita will be remembered in 20 years like the following 3DS games?

You talk as if the WiiU has a better game library objectively. Subjectively, I own a PSTV and I would much rather play Vita games than WiiU titles because I'm an RPG guy. Btw, I do think that the WiiU will outsell the Vita. Also, you claim that you're not bias when you're being bias against the Vita in favor of the WiiU by saying that that the WiiU has more system sellers. There's so much personal context that goes into the argument of a system seller that there will never be one definition of what a system seller is. So the WiiU having more system sellers than the Vita is not an objective statement, but a subjective one even if sales will say otherwise.

It's proving you wrong that handheld consoles don't have culturally significant games outside Pokémon. The Vita might not have them, but the 3DS does.

Sorry man, you have wrong.

Sony have always support you console because have always sold good, (all above 80M), PSV will probabily be discontinued by 2016...