By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Would you date a transsexual?

 

Well, would you?

Definitively. 80 7.70%
 
Yes, but only if attracti... 139 13.38%
 
Yes...but only completely post-op. 26 2.50%
 
I don't know. 74 7.12%
 
Probably not; I would be ... 113 10.88%
 
No. 374 36.00%
 
Transsexuality is disgusting. 155 14.92%
 
You're weird, Wright. 78 7.51%
 
Total:1,039
Seece said:
Michael-5 said:

Probably not, for a couple reasons.

- I want to have genetic offpring and a family
- Risk of STD's are higher in transexuals

But I'm sure the head is good


Any case studies of this? I'm curious as to why this would be the case.

I don't have one off hand, but the LGBT community is at higher risk for STD's. This is why the aids epidemic spread through the gay community so quickly in the 90's. The reason I've been told is that since there is no risk of pregnancy, the likelyhood of intercourse without a condom is greater.

Plus also reason #3, I have a gf which I adore.....should be reason #1 LOL



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Around the Network
Michael-5 said:
Seece said:


Any case studies of this? I'm curious as to why this would be the case.

I don't have one off hand, but the LGBT community is at higher risk for STD's. This is why the aids epidemic spread through the gay community so quickly in the 90's. The reason I've been told is that since there is no risk of pregnancy, the likelyhood of intercourse without a condom is greater.

Plus also reason #3, I have a gf which I adore.....should be reason #1 LOL

That risk is within everyone with mandy different sexpartners. In the 18th and 19th century it mainly was a problem for wealthy men and by far more for men than women.

Problem with aids was, there seemed no need for condoms etc. because things like syphilis didn't play a major role anymore in the eighties.

The combination of promiscuity with insufficient protection is what raises the risks.



Non. More than likely not.



Ka-pi96 said:
TheJimbo1234 said:
Nope.
Thing is, when you meet people like this, you don't have the same chemistry as you would with someone of the opposite sex (down to pheromones, naturalistics picking things up etc). Until science can change their DNA, most people wouldn't be comfortable.

Except they can get male/female hormones anyways, so that isn't true...


*facepalm*

That does not change pheremones though as hormones only combat the persons natural hormones rather than utterly replace.



Seece said:
Michael-5 said:

Probably not, for a couple reasons.

- I want to have genetic offpring and a family
- Risk of STD's are higher in transexuals

But I'm sure the head is good


Any case studies of this? I'm curious as to why this would be the case.

i'd like to know too. I know its the accepted fact...but is it actually fact? It is my opinion that it just gets blown out of proportions coz of same sex sex. 

Genetic family can be achieved through your own sperm and probably a donated egg... yeah.. i dont know if thats a thing, but sperms get donated, why not egs?



Around the Network

Actually the risk is only greater for man on man sex because the rectal tissue is more prone to micro-tears than the vaginal canal, and thus the pathway for successfully transmitting a carried desease is higher.
But then, if youre having sex with someone carrying stds, and they havent beem honest about it, and thus taken due precautions, the problem isn't that they have stds, the problem is that theyre douchebags.

 

So lets be straight here,  anal sex is more of an issuethan sexual persuasion. 



I have to say no, I'm only ever going to date or be in a relationship with natural women.
It has nothing to do with being able or incapable of having children, it's a matter of my own personal tastes.

I consider transgendered, post-op ladies in the same light as dating a man, you may not feel like you're a man, but you weren't born with a womb, whether it functions or not is not important.

I'm not even bothered about having kids, if it happens when/if I meet a woman I want to share my life with, then I'll be the best dad I can be, but much like marriage I don't see it as essential to my life, more the sort of thing I would commit to if it was of the utmost importance to the girl I love.
If the girl I loved wanted kids, but we couldn't have them for whatever reason, then I'd happily adopt, but she'd be a natural woman.

If I found out that a "girl" I was dating or was in a relationship with was transgendered after we'd been intimate or even kissed then I'd feel betrayed, it's something very important that I feel I have a right to know about a person I'm seeing and honesty is very important too me.
I'd absolutely have to end things with that person if I started to spend time with them with a view to a romantic relationship and I found out they weren't a naturally born woman.



Ka-pi96 said:
Kane1389 said:


That wasnt my point actually, i wasnt comenting on wheter it was unethical or not.

However, Jewish origin, black skin colour and muslim religion aren't mental illness like transsexualism is, so it cant really be compared. It is normal for people to feel repulsed by an ilness (as this thread proves), especially if some people act like its not.

Life choices aren't an illness...


So you think transsexualism is a choice? Some people choose to feel like they're born with an unfitting gender?

It's a real, proven, mental disorder



Ka-pi96 said:

It's not a dysfunction, physical or mental! Neither is homosexuality. People can live however they want and like different things. That doesn't make them ill or mean they need to be 'cured' or anything like that.

How can you be so delusional?

Quote Tree Shortened and User Moderated - Conegamer



captain carot said:
Michael-5 said:
Seece said:


Any case studies of this? I'm curious as to why this would be the case.

I don't have one off hand, but the LGBT community is at higher risk for STD's. This is why the aids epidemic spread through the gay community so quickly in the 90's. The reason I've been told is that since there is no risk of pregnancy, the likelyhood of intercourse without a condom is greater.

Plus also reason #3, I have a gf which I adore.....should be reason #1 LOL

That risk is within everyone with mandy different sexpartners. In the 18th and 19th century it mainly was a problem for wealthy men and by far more for men than women.

Problem with aids was, there seemed no need for condoms etc. because things like syphilis didn't play a major role anymore in the eighties.

The combination of promiscuity with insufficient protection is what raises the risks.

What's your point? Still means that transexuals are more likely to have STD's

Ka-pi96 said:
Michael-5 said:
Seece said:


Any case studies of this? I'm curious as to why this would be the case.

I don't have one off hand, but the LGBT community is at higher risk for STD's. This is why the aids epidemic spread through the gay community so quickly in the 90's. The reason I've been told is that since there is no risk of pregnancy, the likelyhood of intercourse without a condom is greater.

Plus also reason #3, I have a gf which I adore.....should be reason #1 LOL

That doesn't mean there is a higher risk of getting an STD then. You'd have complete control over whether you used a condom or not so it would be you deciding whether to take the risk or not, it wouldn't be there by default.

Many STD's can be transferred orally, and when you're married (ideally) the condom goes away.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results