RolStoppable said:
Because it applied to you. Maybe the next time you call out the premise for being flawed instead of struggling with a counter-argument. |
I still don't get it!What did I write and made you to post the previous comment?
RolStoppable said:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6982223 Here you accepted the premise that all Nintendo consoles will be like the Wii U. |
How?Βy writing and showing that nintendo makes more money on hardware than on software?This is what I have written in this post!
| SJReiter said: I do find it somewhat telling that even Nintendo themselves say that the only incentive to upgrade from a Wii to a Wii U is the games. Pretty sure Sony or Microsoft execs would say there are many more reasons than just games to upgrade to their latest consoles. It's like Nintendo are admitting that the only thing they do well is make games. If that's the case, then maybe that's all you should do. Just a thought. |
What do you buy a gaming console for, lol.
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Oh okay, I thought you responded to my first line cause thats where I said "you don't really care" and etc "Thats probably cause we get a thread about Nintendo going third party at least once or twice a month but we rarely get a thread about Sony or Microsoft going third party and of course, if we are going to talk about games being avaliable on every platform, than people should include that both Sony and Microsoft First party should also be avaliable in every platform including PC" "Again: The whole industry is making money on the Playstation and Xbox, on the other hand only Nintendo is making money on the Wii U (3DS is another case, but with the shrinking dedicated handheld market I wouldn't be surprised if the situation there becomes similar to the Wii U situation) that is the crucial difference." Cause the industry making money on PS/Xbox has almost nothing to do with people not making threads about Sony/Microsoft going third party vs Nintendo since the industry is making money on PC. So I am a bit confused as to why the Industry making money prevent people from making "Sony/Microsoft" going third party threads since the industry money topic is not really even touched up on the Nintendo going third party threads |
OK, first I hope that we're on the same page that "going third party" means getting out of the hardware business, not just releasing your first party games everywhere.
If we're clear on that then I think that it's not that hard to understand, sure the industry is also making money on the PC, but there are still (tens of) millions of people that do not want to game on PC and instead go for a console and that's why I'm saying that there is less of a reason to call for MS or Sony to go third party (until the whole industry moves towards a streaming model) because all of these people now buying Xboxs/PSs, not for their exclusives but simply because they aren't interested in gaming on a PC, would possibly turn away from gaming if there were no consoles anymore, which would strip away huge revenue streams for all publishers.
Hope that somewhat clears this up.
RolStoppable said:
tak13, sadly you don't seem to understand! Let's end the discussion... |
You are Imitating me!Mimicry is honorific...!Thank you!
Conina said:
|
Is this the new Wii Fit set? Probably comes in different weight classes so you can lift while playing, pretty brilliant move by Nintendo!
| bunchanumbers said: You are aware that Sony is closer to what you're predicting than Nintendo is? Sony execs are already debating among themselves whether or not PS5 will be physical or cloud based. They already are working on bringing their PS Now library to non Sony devices and even allow streaming PS4 games to Sony tablets. Its a great idea but you got the wrong company. Sony will end up having their PS5 cloud service on the next Nintendo console, along with all phones, tablets, TVs, PCs etc. |
That will be funny if it happens. Then there be no more excuses for Sony fans who also want to play Nintendo games. Well I am sure they will move the goal line like devs do every generation.
Sounds like Sony would be closer to that than Nintendo tbh.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
| DerNebel said: OK, first I hope that we're on the same page that "going third party" means getting out of the hardware business, not just releasing your first party games everywhere. If we're clear on that then I think that it's not that hard to understand, sure the industry is also making money on the PC, but there are still (tens of) millions of people that do not want to game on PC and instead go for a console and that's why I'm saying that there is less of a reason to call for MS or Sony to go third party (until the whole industry moves towards a streaming model) because all of these people now buying Xboxs/PSs, not for their exclusives but simply because they aren't interested in gaming on a PC, would possibly turn away from gaming if there were no consoles anymore, which would strip away huge revenue streams for all publishers. Hope that somewhat clears this up. |
Ah I see, yea that does clear it up a lot more, thanks
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850
| DexInDaJungle said: Is this the new Wii Fit set? Probably comes in different weight classes so you can lift while playing, pretty brilliant move by Nintendo! |
WiiU tablet controller = 491 g
Ipega (246 g) + Kindle Fire HDX (303 g) = 549 g ... not much difference in weight and size
And there are lighter compatible tablets available: Ipega (246 g) + Lenovo IdeaTab S5000 (246 g) = 492 g
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
