What? Thats like saying where was the "We have the fastest selling system ever"  from Sony during the PS3 era...

No, it's not like that. It's like saying you have sold near 10 million consoles.

MetaTrolls that fought against each other will correct this in a few days if they get wind of Nintendo's claim.

Then no current gen Nintendo game will have a user score higher than 8.4 anymore. ;)

why is it embarassing? you can't act like the User Score is irrelevant. if User Scores had no relevance then they would all be roughly the same; but the reality is some games have fantastic user averages and some have mediocre or bad. there are tons of Nintendo haters out there, so explain to me how it makes any sense that their games remain highly rated if the user-Meta has no relevance? surely there are as many Nintendo haters as any other brand out there

also you look at a game like Dragon Age Inquistiion that has a kajillion negative reviews per system, and then you look at a Nintendo game which is beloved almost universally by those playilng it. you can't cut it anyway you want- there has to be some consistency in how you judge a rating system. it doesn't make sense that the users are killing certain games and then letting other games remain high for no apparent reason (despite that brand having tons of haters). my point is that obviously the user Metacritic rating is quite relevant and to some degree represents the quality and respect a game has

You lost me...

right which is why they are bragging about it now. you don't brag about something if it is currently happening. think please, do yourself a favor and think

Ok. Watch. I'll just log on and rank all Nintendo games zero.
Does that make it relevant? Of course not. Which is what goes on with user scores. I mean, really, how it's even possible to rate something a ZERO is beyond me.

So yes. Very embarrassing.

I would say both critic-reviews and user-reviews have their own problems, but different ones. So putting them together makes sense actually. That are two indicating data-points instead of only one. Still not the best metric, but the lead here is solid enough.

More problematic actually is, that 3DS and WiiU are longer on the market than PS4/XBO/Vita and therefore could gain more titles. But PR always do cherry picking, so it's OK that for once Nintendo gets a good result. But some people here can't accept one good thing for Nintendo, while PR-cherry-picking in favor of the company they are supporting is always praised. *sigh*

Most advertising from game companies are embarrassing...

I also put it forth that given the more heated competition between Microsoft and Sony due to sharing games on their platforms, user scores actually ARE more heated between them.