By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - 3DS in 2015: Is it really this bad?

curl-6 said:
If it means more Wii U support, 3DS can drop off the earth for all I care, haha.


LMAO, they'll be a strong enough backlogue to keep owners entertained.



Around the Network
noname2200 said:
curl-6 said:
Twilord said:
Did you just saying Xenoblade is third party? - I'm pretty sure its second party which is basically first-party WITH ATTITUDE.

Nope, it's full-on first party. Nintendo owns Monolith.

Only 96%+, which is no different than 0% when you stop to think about it.

Of course 96%+ is different from 0%. The former means owning a controlling interest.

Monolith Soft is a Nintendo first party developer.



curl-6 said:
noname2200 said:
curl-6 said:
Twilord said:
Did you just saying Xenoblade is third party? - I'm pretty sure its second party which is basically first-party WITH ATTITUDE.

Nope, it's full-on first party. Nintendo owns Monolith.

Only 96%+, which is no different than 0% when you stop to think about it.

Of course 96%+ is different from 0%. The former means owning a controlling interest.

Monolith Soft is a Nintendo first party developer.

You're one of those silly people who thinks there's such a thing as "close enough," aren't you? #allornothing



noname2200 said:
curl-6 said:

Of course 96%+ is different from 0%. The former means owning a controlling interest.

Monolith Soft is a Nintendo first party developer.

You're one of those silly people who thinks there's such a thing as "close enough," aren't you? #allornothing

They are a first party developer. Xenoblade Chronicles and its sequel are first party Nintendo games. 



Xenoblade and Codename Steam are not third party.



Around the Network
mZuzek said:

It's always been. Ever since Red and Blue came out in the West in 1998, the only years without a main series Pokémon title released in America were 2002, 2006 and 2008.

This is partly due to the localization delay. In the West, Pokemon has been "catching up" with Japan this whole time. So while we had only three years without a release, Japan has had five. Now that the games are released simultaneously, the Western release schedule should more closely resemble its Japanese counterpart.

The end result is that while it's not uncommon for Pokemon to have a main-series release for three years in a row, it's also not uncommon for it to take a 'break' for a year between releases, especially between generations. Basically, I expect Z next year, and a 'break' in 2016.



curl-6 said:

They are a first party developer. Xenoblade Chronicles and its sequel are first party Nintendo games. 

It hurts to see that you've been "played" twice in the same thread.



NintendoPie said:

It hurts to see that you've been "played" twice in the same thread.

He'll figure it out ... 



fatslob-:O said:
NintendoPie said:

It hurts to see that you've been "played" twice in the same thread.

He'll figure it out ... 

Can't play the willing. ;)

Hell, sometimes bouncing a ball off a brick wall is fun, even if you're not accomplishing anything.



I'm guessing the first party titles will mostly be New 3DS exclusives not yet announced. Betting on Galaxy 3D at the end of the year.