By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is PS4 going the wrong direction?

DarkD said:
DonFerrari said:

I made a thread because a journalist put an article defending that the WiiU rise in sells were more because lost interest in PS4/X1 than for Mk8 and Nintendo, conclusion of the thread.. the writer was completly wrong, Mk8 was the biggest reason.. yet you started saying it was because of sony/ms fumble then say it is obvious it was because of MK8 and other things just helped... how much are you going to change your point and still be wrong?

Even if I fully explained everything, I would just get 5 people responding saying TL;DR then cherry picking some minor parts that they didn't like.  Then I would have to explain the whole thing over again anyways.  I'm already re-explaining the obvious for you as it is....  Why do I need a bigger headache.  I don't know if you've noticed, but people don't really look at the big picture on this site.  


Yes I understand that looking at you.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
DonFerrari said:

So Sony sold 10M in June 30th because they stockpiled the launch (and were sold out up to May), and still is in some places? Yes sure... And I deny the numbers in this site since they are completely off since the beggining of the gen, PS4 is about 300-500k undertracked here. And to you if a console doesn't sell as good as Wii it fumbles, so if it sells bellow GC what is it doing?

I read your links, did you? Where does it prove or at least put a good argument on the issue? I sent you a different one that is a lot more direct and answer you. But if you want to ignore it so you can say you are right no problem to me... for you Sony can't be right and wouldn't be a good bet for customer because "they won't return your investiment"...

Tell me how MS and Nintendo returned your investment in their last 2 years of X360 and Wii.

Well I believe that anyone who posts on this forum should be willing to accept this website as a reference.  If you're not then get off VGChartz....

As far as your link goes, companies lie about stuff like that all the time.  My theory is that they had two plans going in.  1) with DRM 2) without DRM.  Jack Tretton made those statements earlier to make Sony seem innocent if they decided to go with the non-DRM route.  Basically they were playing both sides.  My opinion on this isn't even Sony-hate as you would put it, it's just my skeptical nature.  Companies do this kind of thing all the time.  It's only good business practice to do it.  



DarkD said:

With your first point...  I think you need to reread some stuff because you should be able to answer that yourself...

I wasn't villifying anyone, you guys have been doing that to Microsoft all by yourself.  I was the one explaining why all three are equally evil.  If anything you just attacked your side with that one.  

Oooooohhhh!

This is my favorite part.

First things first, tell me were my allegiance lies.

Secondly, This entire thread was created for the express purpose of downplaying the PS4, yet you say those in opposition are villifying Microsoft? Not to mention calling any of the three evil is extremely immature.

Third of all,

DarkD said:

Sony and Microsoft aren't anywhere close to where they should be sales wise.  The winning console should be sold out pretty much for the whole of the first year.  That's just basic history for games consoles.  

pulled from ass, being sold out is a terrible position to be in, basic economics 1 o 1. The PS3 was basically sold out for its first year as well.

DarkD said:

Fourthly,

 People instantly villianized Microsoft at that moment.  

Why would people get mad at attempted screwing over.

Nintendo was dead from the get-go..  

Fifth of all,

Making the Wii the winner of the last console generation had already soured much of Nintendo's reputation.  

This is unsubstainated bull.

Sixthly,

They didn't stand a chance no matter what they released.  They're gaining back some traction now that Sony and Microsoft are tripping up all over the place.  

You told me to reread this post, but It seems to me you don't even understand what you've said. I said they released a year earlier so their was no excuse. Not to mention, that the claim that the Wii U is gaining traction now that it has competion which is not only silly, but blatantly false






In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

DarkD said:
DonFerrari said:

So Sony sold 10M in June 30th because they stockpiled the launch (and were sold out up to May), and still is in some places? Yes sure... And I deny the numbers in this site since they are completely off since the beggining of the gen, PS4 is about 300-500k undertracked here. And to you if a console doesn't sell as good as Wii it fumbles, so if it sells bellow GC what is it doing?

I read your links, did you? Where does it prove or at least put a good argument on the issue? I sent you a different one that is a lot more direct and answer you. But if you want to ignore it so you can say you are right no problem to me... for you Sony can't be right and wouldn't be a good bet for customer because "they won't return your investiment"...

Tell me how MS and Nintendo returned your investment in their last 2 years of X360 and Wii.

Well I believe that anyone who posts on this forum should be willing to accept this website as a reference.  If you're not then get off VGChartz....

As far as your link goes, companies lie about stuff like that all the time.  My theory is that they had two plans going in.  1) with DRM 2) without DRM.  Jack Tretton made those statements earlier to make Sony seem innocent if they decided to go with the non-DRM route.  Basically they were playing both sides.  My opinion on this isn't even Sony-hate as you would put it, it's just my skeptical nature.  Companies do this kind of thing all the time.  It's only good business practice to do it.  

So you should ask for all people with above 2 years on the site and more than 1k posts to leave here... and the mods as well... anyone not interested in using VGC numbers in their favour knows that they get adjusted pretty much all week now because of imprecision... in May X1 was overtacked almost 50% and PSVita undertracked like 500%... so yes, for LTD the site is reliable (but even so they had to add 1M to X360 numbers to match latest shipping figures)... and in Germany VGC is 1M overtracking X360 and 300k PS3.

But if you want to take VGC numbers as gospel your choice, but just go look for the corrections made before you put to much faith on it.

So your answer to my post showing that they alread had said they wouldn't put DRM (instead of your weak point that they removed it because of MS flack, that you base on a rumour of a interview that don't have a link) is that they were doing it anyway... so no amount of proof would suffice...

Ok I'm out of this discussion with you, you don't even listen reason you already decided what you want to believe and will stay on it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
DarkD said:

With your first point...  I think you need to reread some stuff because you should be able to answer that yourself...

I wasn't villifying anyone, you guys have been doing that to Microsoft all by yourself.  I was the one explaining why all three are equally evil.  If anything you just attacked your side with that one.  

Oooooohhhh!

This is my favorite part.

First things first, tell me were my allegiance lies.

Secondly, This entire thread was created for the express purpose of downplaying the PS4, yet you say those in opposition are villifying Microsoft? Not to mention calling any of the three evil is extremely immature.

Third of all,

DarkD said:

Sony and Microsoft aren't anywhere close to where they should be sales wise.  The winning console should be sold out pretty much for the whole of the first year.  That's just basic history for games consoles.  

pulled from ass, being sold out is a terrible position to be in, basic economics 1 o 1. The PS3 was basically sold out for its first year as well.

DarkD said:

Fourthly,

 People instantly villianized Microsoft at that moment.  

Why would people get mad at attempted screwing over.

Nintendo was dead from the get-go..  

Fifth of all,

Making the Wii the winner of the last console generation had already soured much of Nintendo's reputation.  

This is unsubstainated bull.

Sixthly,

They didn't stand a chance no matter what they released.  They're gaining back some traction now that Sony and Microsoft are tripping up all over the place.  

You told me to reread this post, but It seems to me you don't even understand what you've said. I said they released a year earlier so their was no excuse. Not to mention, that the claim that the Wii U is gaining traction now that it has competion which is not only silly, but blatantly false




Ok first look at DonFerrari's posts...  That is what I meant by villianizing microsoft....  

I'm not gonna respond to the rest because it sounds more like you don't understand the english and are misreading it somewhere...  



Around the Network
DonFerrari said:
DarkD said:
DonFerrari said:

So Sony sold 10M in June 30th because they stockpiled the launch (and were sold out up to May), and still is in some places? Yes sure... And I deny the numbers in this site since they are completely off since the beggining of the gen, PS4 is about 300-500k undertracked here. And to you if a console doesn't sell as good as Wii it fumbles, so if it sells bellow GC what is it doing?

I read your links, did you? Where does it prove or at least put a good argument on the issue? I sent you a different one that is a lot more direct and answer you. But if you want to ignore it so you can say you are right no problem to me... for you Sony can't be right and wouldn't be a good bet for customer because "they won't return your investiment"...

Tell me how MS and Nintendo returned your investment in their last 2 years of X360 and Wii.

Well I believe that anyone who posts on this forum should be willing to accept this website as a reference.  If you're not then get off VGChartz....

As far as your link goes, companies lie about stuff like that all the time.  My theory is that they had two plans going in.  1) with DRM 2) without DRM.  Jack Tretton made those statements earlier to make Sony seem innocent if they decided to go with the non-DRM route.  Basically they were playing both sides.  My opinion on this isn't even Sony-hate as you would put it, it's just my skeptical nature.  Companies do this kind of thing all the time.  It's only good business practice to do it.  

So you should ask for all people with above 2 years on the site and more than 1k posts to leave here... and the mods as well... anyone not interested in using VGC numbers in their favour knows that they get adjusted pretty much all week now because of imprecision... in May X1 was overtacked almost 50% and PSVita undertracked like 500%... so yes, for LTD the site is reliable (but even so they had to add 1M to X360 numbers to match latest shipping figures)... and in Germany VGC is 1M overtracking X360 and 300k PS3.

But if you want to take VGC numbers as gospel your choice, but just go look for the corrections made before you put to much faith on it.

So your answer to my post showing that they alread had said they wouldn't put DRM (instead of your weak point that they removed it because of MS flack, that you base on a rumour of a interview that don't have a link) is that they were doing it anyway... so no amount of proof would suffice...

Ok I'm out of this discussion with you, you don't even listen reason you already decided what you want to believe and will stay on it.


What you don't seem to understand is that it's a theory.  I'm not stating facts here.  I am drawing conclusions from facts.  Your problem seems to be that you think I'm stating things I know for a fact.  I don't know any of this, however this is a thread for discussing possibilities, not slapping eachother on the back agreeing with eachother.  

My original post was that Microsoft and Nintendo could reciprocate fans better than Sony could.  That isn't a fact its a conclusion I drew from everything that's happened until now.  The Last of Us Remastered, Sony's Money problems.  etc

Your counters were to villify Microsoft, which I didn't agree with.  I think all three of them are just as greedy as the other.  You seem to have Sony on a pedastal of omnipotance and they couldn't possibly lie about anything....  I take lieing as a given.  As far as interviews go, I assume every interview is riddled with lies.  Weather its about features a game will have, or a corporations stance on DRM....  I assume they are lieing.  At the end of the day, they're just doing what's best for business.  



DarkD said:
DonFerrari said:
DarkD said:

Well I believe that anyone who posts on this forum should be willing to accept this website as a reference.  If you're not then get off VGChartz....

As far as your link goes, companies lie about stuff like that all the time.  My theory is that they had two plans going in.  1) with DRM 2) without DRM.  Jack Tretton made those statements earlier to make Sony seem innocent if they decided to go with the non-DRM route.  Basically they were playing both sides.  My opinion on this isn't even Sony-hate as you would put it, it's just my skeptical nature.  Companies do this kind of thing all the time.  It's only good business practice to do it.  

So you should ask for all people with above 2 years on the site and more than 1k posts to leave here... and the mods as well... anyone not interested in using VGC numbers in their favour knows that they get adjusted pretty much all week now because of imprecision... in May X1 was overtacked almost 50% and PSVita undertracked like 500%... so yes, for LTD the site is reliable (but even so they had to add 1M to X360 numbers to match latest shipping figures)... and in Germany VGC is 1M overtracking X360 and 300k PS3.

But if you want to take VGC numbers as gospel your choice, but just go look for the corrections made before you put to much faith on it.

So your answer to my post showing that they alread had said they wouldn't put DRM (instead of your weak point that they removed it because of MS flack, that you base on a rumour of a interview that don't have a link) is that they were doing it anyway... so no amount of proof would suffice...

Ok I'm out of this discussion with you, you don't even listen reason you already decided what you want to believe and will stay on it.


What you don't seem to understand is that it's a theory.  I'm not stating facts here.  I am drawing conclusions from facts.  Your problem seems to be that you think I'm stating things I know for a fact.  I don't know any of this, however this is a thread for discussing possibilities, not slapping eachother on the back agreeing with eachother.  

My original post was that Microsoft and Sony could reciprocate fans better than Sony could.  That isn't a fact its a conclusion I drew from everything that's happened until now.  The Last of Us Remastered, Sony's Money problems.  etc

Your counters were to villify Microsoft, which I didn't agree with.  I think all three of them are just as greedy as the other.  You seem to have Sony on a pedastal of omnipotance and they couldn't possibly lie about anything....

A conspiracy theory you mean. If you wanted to say "it's possible that Sony looked at it but didn't implement" I wouldn't discus... but you are pretty bent on believing that even if data proves that there was no real data on them putting DRM but there is data for not putting it you choose to be certain "in theory" that they done it.

I villified MS? I just asked you to prove MS and/or Ninty put gamers money to better use than Sony. And your first point was pretty bashfull on Sony, and that isn't uphold in VGC for any platform.

All company are after money, that much is certain. And I don't have Sony on a pedastal, but false conjecture doesn't have my approval side to them.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

I'm take a wild guess that you copied a bunch of disgruntled Xbox fan comments from N4G as well as some MisterXMedia statements, picked your favorites, and created a list with them that you treat as "facts". It doesn't exactly make you look intelligent to say the top performing console is doing bad, when your favorite one is doing the worst. I digress. With all these threads you create, I'd say the PS4's success is really bothering you. I think you need a hug.



0331 Happiness is a belt-fed weapon

DarkD said:

Ok first look at DonFerrari's posts...  That is what I meant by villianizing microsoft....  

I don't give a damn at what DonFerrari said, I'm responding to you.

I'm not gonna respond to the rest because it sounds more like you don't understand the english and are misreading it somewhere...  

You don't have to lie, you cannot respond because you are wrong, and you refuse to admit it. Otherwise, you would've explained how I misread it if this is truly the case. Not to mention, only six was in response to the claim you said I misread. 1-5, where other stupid things you said such as: a winning console should be sold out, Microsoft was villianized, the Wii winning ruined Nintendo's reputation and doomed the Wii U, that the Wii U is gaining traction because the XB1 and PS4 are faltering(Despite the fact that the not only all increased in sales and the Wii U sold more on the holiday of its release then last holiday), and that the Wii U would fail out of the gate (Irrelevant because they had a full year BY THEMSELVES TO FIX IT), all of which are obvious lies.

Perhaps, I should go easier on you, you've clearly shown you cannot handle this kind of blantant exposure. At the same time, I'm not known for pulling any punches, and I already told you to give it up, and you still doggedly go on like you are on some righteous holy war, a knight in shining armor, valiantly charging into the Console Wars, failing to realize that your armor has rusted on the inside, your horse is old and sickly, and your sword is made of cardboard.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
DarkD said:

Ok first look at DonFerrari's posts...  That is what I meant by villianizing microsoft....  

I don't give a damn at what DonFerrari said, I'm responding to you.

I'm not gonna respond to the rest because it sounds more like you don't understand the english and are misreading it somewhere...  

You don't have to lie, you cannot respond because you are wrong, and you refuse to admit it. Otherwise, you would've explained how I misread it if this is truly the case. Not to mention, only six was in response to the claim you said I misread. 1-5, where other stupid things you said such as: a winning console should be sold out, Microsoft was villianized, the Wii winning ruined Nintendo's reputation and doomed the Wii U, that the Wii U is gaining traction because the XB1 and PS4 are faltering(Despite the fact that the not only all increased in sales and the Wii U sold more on the holiday of its release then last holiday), and that the Wii U would fail out of the gate (Irrelevant because they had a full year BY THEMSELVES TO FIX IT), all of which are obvious lies.

Perhaps, I should go easier on you, you've clearly shown you cannot handle this kind of blantant exposure. At the same time, I'm not known for pulling any punches, and I already told you to give it up, and you still doggedly go on like you are on some righteous holy war, a knight in shining armor, valiantly charging into the Console Wars, failing to realize that your armor has rusted on the inside, your horse is old and sickly, and your sword is made of cardboard.


I've been responding to this thread for like an hour now....  your comment was rude and didn't even make any sense, so I said to hell with it, I'm not dealing with you.