for me i spent 60+15+20 on the ps3 probably going to get the ps4 version but will i have to shell out more dough for the DLC to keep %100?

It's not a steal, it's maybe what you can or should expect but nothing less...I mean, if it is "a steal", what would be a "normal price"? 80 bucks?

Remaster or not, it's a game which is one year old and the work done for the PS4 version was probaly only a tenth of the PS3 version so that it's not as if the remaster could be also 60 bucks without any extra content and it would be still be a god price. 

The price/value is fine. He shouldn't say it's a steal though; it's not like it's some kind of bargain. It's the "right price". That does not = a steal. A "steal" would be 30 bucks.

Do you have it digitally?  I don't understand why else you wouldn't just sell it.  I had the steelbook edition so it cost $80 for PS3 and then I sold it for $100 as soon as Remastered was announced.

The game was remastered. Not simply ported.

So is it a steal? No. Entire new games built from the ground up go for the same price.

But is it worth it? Yes

I am just being over the top like he was being. To me it's not a good deal. Others might be fine with paying that much for a remake. Thinking it's a bad price doesn't make you an idiot and neither does being fine with the price.

I would not call it a steal but its a good price being remastered and including the dlc.

To think that something is "priced badly" one must have a wealth of examples of similar products that are of better value. Can you provide such product offerings?

I don't give a crap about "included DLC" or "higher resolution". You released a game 1 year ago, I'm not gonna buy it again for almost full price. The people who wanna buy it and go on ahead, I'm not going to support these 1 year old "remasters".

For what it is? Absolutely, it's great value.

Last year millions payed 60$ for almost half the content, and I don't think anyone was complaining about it not being worth the asking price.