Lets hope the Xbox One at least allows for 900p 60fps. If it can do that then even Xbox owners with tv's over 40 inches should enjoy a desirable resolution to match to solid framerate.

That just means your ultra settings aren't as great as they could be...

Doesn't that just mean they fucked up the PC version?

Considering that Far Cray 3 max setting on PC was not so much better than 360 version, I believe PS4 version of FC4 will be the same as PC at ultra. Getting PS4 version.

meh more artificially crippled PC games incoming?

I'm gonna guess 900p and 30 fps. That a very sexy open world game, I don't anticipate 60 fps on either platform.

This is news?

PS4 and XBO are so close to power and bandwidth of the best GPU's at the moment that PC is not going to be seeing massive improvments over them any time in the near future. The best we are going to get is better framerate, resolution, draw distance, and thats about it.

It will probably not be until 2017 that we start seeing a difference in PC games, because they are going to finally have better hardware, and time spent learning it. PS4 and XBO games will continue to make massive improvements in the next two holidays, as we start getting games built on dev kits for these console from day one, and we start to see 2nd releases from top developers.

For PC to start to see any difference 10TF GPU's will need to be common, 16 - 24GB of staked graphics RAM will have to be common, and a much faster GPU connect than current PCI will be needed.

This has been discussed already few days ago...and in the words of that DICE guy, that's 'embarrassing to hear'.

Ubi is dropping the ball (again) with PC gamers, first with all the nVidia favoritism and WD hidden settings, and now with this.

So many damage control in here, there is even someone defending EA, that's new hehe... people working in the said companies in here or seriously delusional 12y-olds! The day a PS4 or XO is as able as a high-end PC, unicorns will rain from the sky!
Even the best efforts on said consoles lack in resolution, framerate, textures, geometry & shaders/effects... stating otherwise is... Riiiiiiiiidge Raaaaaaaaacer at least!

What's more, is the said games are releasing next year when PC will be even more powerfull & said devs are well aware of the specs coming since they work with hardware devs daily, saying that a non evolutive platform (PS4/XO) will match next years GPU/CPU/Higher speed RAM is just mind bending, how anyone can drink that kind Kool-aid is really sad or deeply mis-informed!

What I don't undestand is the will/eager to eat corporate/PR lies so badly.
Have today's youth lost all critical thinking... I hate that herd thinking, meeeeeheeeheehee all in line sheep!!!

On the other hand developing this kind of graphic quality is expensive as hell & it's skyrocketing by the day, evening the output may be wiser, just don't feed us horse poo. I understand that making games for homogenous platforms is easier, furthermore when the most (not all) of the said gamers on that platforms are not as tech-savy as in the PC community & don't go looking inside game code like PC modders community to reveal devs bullsh*t!

As said before in here, the all graphics business model is a risky one, big budgeted games are often soul-less gambles & are taking a growing toll in the devs community (see Crytek). Maybe the model is flawed & pursuing high-end PC owners & graphic slaves is not the smartest business. But even there, just say so, don't GIMP PC versions so that consoles versions get a better perception!

Ubisoft really hates the PC Master Race...