only if you ignore the third parties. and even then, they can still fail to impress esp without showing the new Zelda
only if you ignore the third parties. and even then, they can still fail to impress esp without showing the new Zelda
I thought Microsoft's conference was bad (nothing but a lukewarm remake with 4 old games) but while watching Sony's conference, I got bored to death and almost felt asleep.
I do not own a Wii-U but Nintendo would have won the E3 with X and Zelda alone, even if Sony and MS were having a great show which they didn't.
It's really interesting to see how Nintendo show will be
Compared to Sony and Microsoft.
You wouldn't think it'd be hard to beat them so long as they show X, Zelda, Smash and some new games.
But this is Nintendo. There's a chance we could see Wii Music 2, a new fitness game and the Vitality sensor return...so nothing is decided yet.
5 hours!
Nintendo show should be very interesting.
We will soon see what they have to offer.
NintendoPie said:
"Sony fan would say Sony conference is the best just because of Uncharted." "Microsoft fan would say MS conference is the best just because of Halo." Terrible logic. |
Have you been paying attention to the comments the past few days?
The only problem with his logic is he said Mario instead of Zelda.
Anyway, Sony and Microsoft really scored an own goal yesterday. X gameplay, Zelda gameplay and a big new game announcement and Nintendo may have this.
Isn't it only 30 minutes? I don't see how Nintendo wins anything with that.
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!
Devil_Survivor said:
You know I ask a lot of PC elitist that question myself when they show up on video comment sections to try to convert every console gamer there. Fanboys will always claim their side won E3 it happens every year because they are so biased to call it down the middle and actually judge each conference on it merits. It alls depends where you sit. Everyone has a preferred side, however some people just able to overcome thier bias recongize more than just thier own views. You seem like one of those people who can be unbiased. |
Except you don't need a 'gaming' pc to play games on a pc. I will never understand why anyone would spend $400 on a "pc" with less available games and much less functionality. That is essentially what new consoles are.
So again, I really don't understand why anyone would spend $400-500 on a limited pc, when they could just put together a real one for the same price (or upgrade a current one for less). I have yet to see any reason why anyone would want a Xbone or PS4 over a pc, because they haven't shown any. The "24-25 third party titles available on PS4 or XBone" is pitiful when compared to the thousands of titles available on any average pc (which includes those same 24-25 games). So what's the point? The main thing that should be selling new consoles is exclusive content, but for some reason that isn't the case. This E3 disappointed me because it only reinforced that fact.
Fusioncode said: Isn't it only 30 minutes? I don't see how Nintendo wins anything with that. |
Is this true? I have it listed as a one hour event...
"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"
Anfebious said:
|
This says it's only 30 minutes.
http://autoomobile.com/gaming/rumor-nintendo-digital-event-to-last-only-30-minutes/1001916/
Maybe it's wrong idk.
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!