By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Has the bar been set low for Nintendo to steal the show?

NintendoPie said:
small44 said:
Nintendo fan would say Nintendo conference is the best just because of Mario games

"Sony fan would say Sony conference is the best just because of Uncharted."

"Microsoft fan would say MS conference is the best just because of Halo."

Terrible logic.

Shhh! Don't call him out! You may upset him!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Around the Network

both microsoft and sony each only showed 1 interesting game, Scalebound and Bloodborne, so that is what they have going for them, Nintendo needs to show very little to actually have the most interesting showing this year in my opinion.
I really cannot see how Nintendo can end up nto having the most interesting E3 at this point, with their Digital event, Treehouse showings and the Smash tournament, it is going to be amazing, so much content.



Let me put it this way. One of the, if not the most, beloved franchises in gaming will be moving to HD tomorrow. Since it's inception, we've dreamed of this, and tomorrow, the Zelda of our dreams comes into fruition.

Do you understand that shit? ZELDA HD tomorrow.

Unless it's top down, I don't see how they can lose.




Ka-pi96 said:


Bar set low?

Regardless, Nintendo will trip over and fall flat on their face

O RLY? All Nintendo has to do is show Zelda U and Metroid/Star Fox and they win E3!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

All Nintendo has to do to "win" E3 (as if there is such a thing) at this point, is to show an amazing Zelda U reveal trailer, show off whatever Retro has been working on (even just a teaser), show off more of X and Yarn Yoshi, actually show some footage of SMT x FE, and drop at least ONE surprise bombshell (Star Fox, Metroid, Pokemon, F-Zero, etc.), and that's that. They're going to show off some NFC stuff, they already said so. But do this other stuff in addition to that? That pretty much covers it.



Around the Network
noname2200 said:
Kane1389 said:


It worked great for them last year

Yes, the logical conclusion is that things would have gone so much better if they had presented the same material, but spread out over 90 minutes instead.


logical conclusion is that they could shown more things in 90 minutes,or at least in more detail, but then again, you'd need actual content and 3rd parties for a 90 minutes show of games only



Show either a new Starfox, Zelda and/or Metroid game as well as a new IP and I'll be satisfied.



SubiyaCryolite said:
Devil_Survivor said:
marley said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
i can name you 25 third party titles sony and microsoft will get and nintendo dont that say NOP


Can you name me 25 third party titles that will make it worthwhile for me to purchase a ps4 or xbone?

I'm not sure why I should drop $400-500 on a console to play games that will be available on my pc.  I honestly don't understand why anyone would.  For me, it really boils down to first party exclusives, and I have yet to see anything all that exciting.


You just won this thread.

Why is it so hard to understand that not everyone has or wants a decent gaming PC? I have one myself but its incredibly naive to think most gamers would pick a PC over a PS4 or XBox One, they simply cant be bothered. 

From that perspective Nintendo cannot Win E3 in their eyes. If I didn't own a gaming PC then I wouldn't own a Wii U. Id be focussing on a PS4 or X1 and that includes all 3rd party multiplats. From that point of view Nintendo simply wouldn't be on my radar. Why cant we understand each other and just get along?

As a PC and Wii U owner, I expect Nintendo to win. In a world where I didn't have a PC Id consider Sony to have won.

You know I ask a lot of PC elitist that question myself when they show up on video comment sections to try to convert every console gamer there. Fanboys will always claim their side won E3 it happens every year because they are so biased to call it down the middle and actually judge each conference on it merits. It alls depends where you sit. Everyone has a preferred side, however some people just able to overcome thier bias recongize more than just thier own views. You seem like one of those people who can be unbiased.



 

so for wii fans multiplats doesn't count because if you have a 700$ gaming PC you can play 90% of console multiplats..right..
thats not a argument, its just an excuse to the lack of nintendo's 3rd party support.

i think nintendo won't do enough splash this year at E3 to have much hype from the press.



NintendoPie said:
small44 said:
Nintendo fan would say Nintendo conference is the best just because of Mario games

"Sony fan would say Sony conference is the best just because of Uncharted."

"Microsoft fan would say MS conference is the best just because of Halo."

Terrible logic.

Sony and Microsoft had more then Uncharted and Halo in their conferences,Sony had a great conferences interesting 3rd party deal and 3 great first party games,some show a great diversity AAA games,indie games and different genres of games.

People complain about lack  surprises then i don't see any surprise from Nintendo



PS4 - over 100 millions let's say 120m
Xbox One - 70m
Wii U - 25m

Vita - 15m if it will not get Final Fantasy Kingdoms Heart and Monster Hunter 20m otherwise
3DS - 80m