IMO, Xbox Live in 2004 works better then Nintendo's online now. Plus I don't think its Nintendos style to compare to the competition.
IMO, Xbox Live in 2004 works better then Nintendo's online now. Plus I don't think its Nintendos style to compare to the competition.
Conina said:
all these "meh"-games... at best! |
Wow, I can totally see what Sony did there. No wonder you won't let your PS+ membership lapse. I only got mine last year and they stopped giving away all the killer games. I just bought the ones I wanted on disc and have let my PS+ membership lapse.
Conina said:
all these "meh"-games... at best! |
I don't care about scores. I stll say meh to most of them.
Richard_Feynman said:
Do you know why? Because what they offer is the barebones minimum for online console gaming. They are lightyears behind Live and PSN. |
That's a overstatement, lightyears really.
Ka-pi96 said:
|
huh, what?
Nintendo has free online and backward compatibility. That should be a slogan.
PigPen said: I don't care about scores. I stll say meh to most of them. |
Yeah, we know how you would rate games.
Well it doesnt compare to Psn or XBL, but hey, free multiplayer is free multiplayer! No one can deny that!
Yeah but first your gotta get games to advertise that have online. After Smash Bros it out they'll have Mario Kart, probably Bayonetta, maybe X, and they might all use internet. That's 4 titles right there, 2 for sure. And then there's the 3rd party titles
XBOX ONE/Wii U/3DS/PC
RIP Iwata 12/6/1959-7/11/2015
Thanks for all the great memories!
PigPen said: I don't care about scores. I stll say meh to most of them. |
hopeless