It's the same or better experience for us, the hardcore, yes. 100% agreed.
But to everyone else, not being on a stage matters.
It's the same or better experience for us, the hardcore, yes. 100% agreed.
But to everyone else, not being on a stage matters.
media is becoming irrelevant?
wow. Quit being simple-minded.
| BasilZero said: But it isnt a E3 conference....its a Nintendo Direct. |
No, its a different stage. Still a conference.
| celador said: Misleading title. Even though I agree with the content of what you wrote, misleading |
No its not. There is a conference. Just on a different stage.
| Mr Khan said: Fixed my pet peeve of all-caps titles. |
sorry and thx
| BasilZero said: But not a E3 Conference. Its a Nintendo Direct conference. Two different things. Unless you are saying the CES is a E3 as well. |
Its at E3. Its a massive hour+ long presentation of all the same info they always give.
Its an E3 conference on a different stage.
Here's the only thing...Live does convey so much more. Granted, it opens up the possibilities for hiccups and snafus; but that is part of the spectacle.
I don't think it's a deal breaker...but it's not a conference, any more than a music video or a recording of a song is "live". Don't get me wrong, some bands I really prefer not to see live, except to be present during the production of their music. But you can't deny the energy that takes shape during a live performance.
Nintendo has been known, however, as have the other two (as well as Ubi and EA), to deliver painfully uncomfortable conferences. I'm priveldged to have witnessed these first hands, and trust me, they are cringe-worthy (here's looking at you Kinect/Sony Move reveals).
I guess the bottom line is that for the most part the only people that really get to witness the spectacle in all its glory (or lack thereof) are the journalists/industry folk. They're probably the most vocal when it comes to this perceived faux pas from Nintendo. Maybe that's because they don't get to be the center of the show now. For all intents and purposes the internet decides who wins E3...and taking the conference out of the picture diminishes the journalists' sway on that conversation.
So yeah...there's a conference...it just doesn't have the possibility of scoring in the upper echelon of conferences, considering it's pre-taped. Even if they delivered a perfect presentation...a similarly stellar one with a few minor hiccups performed live would score higher in my book.
Ha ha ha. Some people refuses to accept reality. Reality is nintendo wont get the limelight in E3. I am starting to wonder why nintendo quit stage show? Lack of cash? Lack of games? Or both?
superchunk said:
|
To have an E3 conference you have to attend E3, which is what you're title suggests. Although it may be the same effect to people watching a live stream, it still isn't the same
There's a Nintendo Direct; but it's not a conference. You could even say that the difference is in name only, but they're still not the same thing.
They'll be at E3, yeah. But they won't be on stage presenting their games in the usual manner. It'll be a Direct, which is fine, but you can understand why people say they're not having a conference...