Zod95 said:
Wow, you must have dual personality! First you praise my article, then you ostracize it, now you use it as reference? You talk like being pro-Nintendo was some kind of disease that people deny at first. Take it easy Nintendo's behavior has actually improved along the time. They were much worse in the 80's. I guess the DLCs and the 1-Mario-per-year practice is a normal reaction from a company that doesn't enjoy anymore the easy- business it had 2 or 3 decades ago. In spite of these moves, Nintendo is not as greedy nowadays. They are entering in a new cycle (new facilities, HD development, etc.), which is a real challenge for them. Those bad moves may not be the bravest way to face the challenge but at least they are doing it. Well or badly, they are moving forward. So, I would say EA is not as bad as you think and the same thing applies to the "new Nintendo". In these kind of environments (videogaming), where things grow exponentially, it is harder to have a decent performance in the current level than to champion an older one. Nintendo is finally entering in the 7th-gen-level with Wii U (please don't take me wrong, it's just the truth) and thus a new world of possibilities is opening for them. They need to embrace them. If they do it successfully, Nintendo fans will be amazed by experiencing Nintendo's quality on modern gaming. |
I rather appreciate if you didn't imply I have a mental disorder as bipolairty. I never praised your article, if you didn't get my first comment (Where I "praise" you) it was actually a sarcastic remark, so yeah I was never in agreement with your article.
I use it in my thread because I found it to be good evidence about Nintendo being a lot like EA, with their evil practices and all that. The idea of the whole thread came from the Maelstrom article though.
"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"








