Except Sega never had more than one really successful system. Anyone who really thinks they should go third party is just short-sighted, they will just have a slow downward slope and bring part of the gaming industry along with them. It's ONE system, guys. It's only been a little over a year now.
Troll thread. No other company is suggested of this question. Gee, I wonder why? That is why Nintendo is always in the fanboys heads.
Estelle and Adol... best characters ever! XD
DanneSandin said:
Yeah, I'm sure Sony would LOVE to have just ONE Nintendo game on their console, so that Nintendo can steal away costumers from them... |
sony dont make much money out of firstparty titles,and nintendo isnt in the traditionell console game anymore.
| xNonox said: Except Sega never had more than one really successful system. Anyone who really thinks they should go third party is just short-sighted, they will just have a slow downward slope and bring part of the gaming industry along with them. It's ONE system, guys. It's only been a little over a year now. |
Its been down hill for decades, wii has a fad anaomoly. Nin console sales have been droppin since the Nes.
Nem said:
Present SEGA is nothing like old SEGA. And did you forget they required an unfavorable merger with Sammy to survive? They had 9 development teams where today they have what? 3? Dont play with us, theres no way to sugercoat the fact that SEGA got alot worse by going third party. Many of their games wich had their audience on SEGA consoles could not find an audience on the new consoles. The same exact thing would happen to Nintendo. Nintendo games sell to Nintendo fans for the most part. Where would these be without Nintendo systems? The Playstation? the Xbox? the Vita? The PC? Nowhere/left gaming? Everywhere? You have no clue. So, what is the development of one quality SKU has to become the development of several spreading your efforts to find an audience. Its not as simple as you make it sound and its not as risk free as Drake4 thinks. |
do your research, how well did Sega CD do? how about 32x? Saturn? Game Gear? Dreamcast? You really think Sega was all peaches and cream BEFORE they went 3rd party, they went 3rd party in the first place BECAUSE they were sucking, period. THey still hold the record for having the worst console reveal in history. Could not find an audience on new consoles? what games, Sonic on GC did better than Sonic on DC, VF4 was the best selling one, that was on PS2. What are these games taht didnt find an audience. You have no clue
Multishanks said:
And Sega gets most of it's money from Sega Sammy, so nintendo should get involved with gambling and leave the console market completely. ;p
My take on it is no one really knows what they should do because that is the state of the industry right now. It's in a huge transition where things are very much unsure. Nintendo picked a hell of a time to have a soft launch and post launch. Consumers are confused by their direction and rightfully so. They will figure something out though. They've been expanding for a reason.
I'm honestly not sure anyone knows what to do at this point. Microsoft is probably the most succesful at this point and they started out this generation back tracking. This will be interesting to see in two to three years. |
I never said they should go 3rd party, but to act like there would be no benefits is just lying to ourselves, for one they are not spending money on HW which would mean more money for other stuff. ANd the Sega comparisons are wrong. Sega became 3rd party because they messed up so much for so long. The idea that Sega was great prior to going 3rd party is wrong and ignoring, the Saturn, CD, 32x and to a lower extent DC debacles. Sega didnt start sucking becasue they went 3rd party, they started sucking cause they had a poor transition into the Wii/PS3/360 era just like damn near every other Japanese company
| oniyide said:
|
God damn you made me think how great sega could have been if they called it quits after the saturn and released all their games on PS, then PS2
If they only were more honest with them selfs, could have been great.
Rather they just lost and lost and failed with hardware and it drove them to be irrelevent. They once had awseome franchises and now they are a joke.
| Zelhawks37 said: Troll thread. No other company is suggested of this question. Gee, I wonder why? That is why Nintendo is always in the fanboys heads. |
no other company has a console that is selling this badly.
| Zelhawks37 said: Troll thread. No other company is suggested of this question. Gee, I wonder why? That is why Nintendo is always in the fanboys heads. |
I never got MS need for a console.
They would be a better 3rd publisher and developer, so much wasted casue they were scared Sonys game consoel would hurt PC pffff.
Those 4 billion for failures could have set up some serious game development.
Cobretti2 said:
|
or maybe, and this is just a thought. People really dont care that much for Ninty games? At least not in the numbers people here swear by.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
