By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Nintendo just needs to go third party on consoles only

drake4 said:
Demensha said:
drake4 said:
softcoregamer82 said:
Nope. They shouldn't and they won't. Their next console might be a hybrid home/handheld anyway.

so there making a console to compete with the 3ds, if anything thats what the 3ds succesor should be.


Why not just make their next system a massive handheld upgrade with an optional adaptor that connects to the tvs hdmi port so u can play the games on your tv?  I find it really stupid when asswipes like yourself want Nintendo to make their games for other systems so you can play their games. Why not just buy their system then? They do make more than enough content to justify the purchase. Not to. Mention over the holidays you could get certain bundles which workes out to the system costing under 200$. 

 

If Nintendo ever went third party I would hope they mail sony and Microsoft a picture of their ass and make the games for iPads only. Then again since Nintendo has more available cash on hand than most companies out there they can afford multiple console generations failures and still be around. Lastly why wouldn't they just focus everything on their handhelds? Imagine the amount of games 3ds would have. Would make the  crappy vita look even worse than it already is. 

lol only 2 franschises i care about from nintedo and i wouldn't even buy them at full price. i made this thread cause nintendo stock is down 17% cause of the wiiu, not to mention a net loss of 25 billion dollars cause of the wiiu.


The fuc*?

It is 25 billion YENS!! Not dollars lol.
They can afford 30 years of this loss.



Around the Network

iOS is closer market than Sony or Microsoft. Plus they could just do handheld, which is the better idea.



"Excuse me sir, I see you have a weapon. Why don't you put it down and let's settle this like gentlemen"  ~ max

They just need to rebrand. The thing with the "core" market is that they are actually not that bias. By core, I dont mean the COD players, I mean people really invested in videogames as medium, not just one or 2 games. The early adopters/trend setters will always be these guys and if Nintendo could launch a system with an incredible launch window and first year, they could easily win them over. Rebranding from their current childish/family image (ala N64, SNES etc), plus the support of major parties would allow them to sell a ton of systems next gen. The crux is that they come in early before the PS5, XboxNext but unlike the wii u provide hardware which is future proof and bound to run the next gen hardware of games relatively easily, even if somewhat scaled down.

Even if the wii u had a stronger line up, I still would have been somewhat weary that it wouldnt recieve 3rd party next gen titles like FF15, Witcher 3 etc. I have no problem with buying a 1st party box, but I definitely wouldnt for the price the wii U is at.



Well to be honest I would like to see a Zelda game on PS4 in 1080p with high res textures. I mean even the Wii U games look fantastic already I wonder what Nintendo could do on a PS4 level hardware.



Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Highly unlikely. Besides Wii U, Nintendo have made profits on obscure hardware. If anything, Sony should start developing games for Nintendo handhelds because they might actually have some respectable sales for once.

lol , never. the 3ds has so much good games, nobody needs crappy sony firstparty titles.

there is a reason why vita is bombing...

Moderated,

-Mr Khan



Around the Network
generic-user-1 said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Highly unlikely. Besides Wii U, Nintendo have made profits on obscure hardware. If anything, Sony should start developing games for Nintendo handhelds because they might actually have some respectable sales for once.

lol , never. the 3ds has so much good games, nobody needs crappy sony firstparty titles.

there is a reason why vita is bombing...

What a suitable username.



drake4 said:
Nem said:
 


Sorry but thats not true at all. The home console and the handheld market cross alot in the hardcore segment.

Most of us here on these forums own portables and home consoles. If we get our Nintendo fix on our home consoles, we are more likely to skip getting the portable.

thats funny cause you could easily get your nintedo fix on the 3ds instead of wiiu, you have a brand new zelda on 3ds, mario land, and mario kart so this applys to wiiu as well, samething with the wiiu.


Yes, that is true. I agree with it. I think part of the reason Wii U is underperforming is because people are getting their Nintendo fix on the 3DS for the last 2 years with the barrage of game releases. Nintendo has to release more games on the Wii U for people to take the leap on the home console.



kabamarutr said:
drake4 said:

They need to just go thirdparty on consoles, they just don't have the core market that sony and microsoft, they can't compete and nintendo knows that and thats why they made the wii, and it was a huge success but thats not happening again the blue ocean market has moved on, they are stuck with out a market and no third party support, chances of being succesful are nearly impossible, the console is really hurting the company, they better focusing on handhelds and making x1 and ps3 games.


You mean...like SEGA?


Sega lost third party support in a similar way, yes, but the writing on the wall for Segas demise was on the wall. Nintendo wont die, they just lost the core market because they lost third parties over a dedcade ago. The core third party market has basically learned not to depend on Nintendo. Nintendo's sales would be amazing if they spread their games across their competitions platforms and keep the portables going. Sega as a console and handheld brand in general was phased off and their third party was just terrible because the market had surpassed their brand of first party. That and Nintendo's hold on third parties didn't really allow Sega to get multiplats until they upped their marketshare.



Why would Nintendo go 3rd party now? It doesn't make sense. As soon as the cost for producing the Wii U comes down, the 3DS will start to make money for Nintendo, and simply not just off putting the losses of the WIi U. Sure, they won't earn as much money as they did during the DS/Wii era, but they'll do good enough to make a come back next gen.

Going third party would mean: paying royalties to the other console makers, thus losing out on money. And the PS4/X1 crowed doesn't seem to be too eager to play Nintendo games; how much did LBP sell? Or LBP Karting/Playstation All-STar? Not even the Jak and Daxter series, by everybodys favorites Naughty Dog, did well compared to Nintendo's games. And that was on the PS3 AND PS2 (which had a user base of 150+m), which arguably has a more diverse library than the X360. Therefore we have to ask ourselves, is there a big enough crowed on these consoles (PS4/X1) to earn back the royalties Nintendo is paying Sony/MS? Probably not, going by other games similar to those Nintendo is making.

This is hard facts backed up with sales of historically similar games to those of Nintendo. This tells us that Nintendo probably wouldn't do as well on these consoles as some would wish they did. Would the Nintendo faithful follow Nintendo to other platforms? Maybe, but we can't be certain about that. They might just as well go to the 3DS for their Nintendo fix.

Nintendo would be far better off just doing handheld games for the rest of the generation, while working on next gen console(s).

I would LOVE to hear some GOOD counter arguments to this. Come at me bro, and I'll serve you crow.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

no



http://moongypsy.bandcamp.com/ ~Thank you Stefl1504 for the amazing sig~