J_Allard said:
Except the servers you're using. But I think you already know that. What is it about selnor that makes people irate to the point of clinging to petty semantics? It's adorable, but I will never understand it. |
Whats that got to do with anything? MS is a business. They will rent servers out to Sony or whoever is willing to rent them. Is that meant to be some amazing plus point for MS???? Sony and MS do business you know. Like a Windows phone from Sony?
Ashadian said:
Whats that got to do with anything? MS is a business. They will rent servers out to Sony or whoever is willing to rent them. Is that meant to be some amazing plus point for MS???? Sony and MS do business you know. Like a Windows phone from Sony? |
You'll have to ask selnor about the point of it but it doesn't mean what he said is wrong. The game uses the same Azure servers MS has set up for Live that the 360 and Xbone versions will.
selnor1983 said:
Thats buying the game. Good luck playing it without Xbox Live servers. |
EA has their own dedicated serves.
| kitler53 said:
well you're banned so it's probably not even worth responding but... ...in the way that ai is never up to par to the intelligence of a human. maybe titanfall will have revolutionary ai but i doubt it. if rolling over thousands of enemies is your thing there is single player modes and co-op/horde modes. but in competitive multiplayer,.. to quote kyliedog "...and AI bots in competitive matches is a joke." bots are subpar to a real human and just aren't as fun to play against. http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-1768471.html |
But who said that the game is supposed to be a traditional multiplayer game? If it is anything like horde mode+6v6 thrown in along with a storyline, it could very well be one of the greatest FPS´s of all time, so I really dont understand your argument at all :).
| pezus said: You also said you didn't want to play a game also out on last gen (360...). Did you really not see the irony? |
there is no irony. just plain and simple hypocrisy.
Why disappointing? Halo's most played and loved game mode Team Slayer, aka Team Deathmatch in other games, is 4v4. And for the doubters, I'm not only talking about the newest entry Halo 4, it was like this in Halo 2, 3 and Reach as well. That's 4 players less and (probably) 12 less Titans/AIs less than Titanfall.
Plus, you are a lot more mobile and agile than in the big 4 shooters. I really do not see the problem here.
I already heard this months ago, and only now people are bitching about it?
In an interview I saw, the developers went with 6v6 because that was what they felt would be the sweet spot for this game. They could have easily added more players, but they felt 6v6 was the perfect number. This has absolutely nothing to do with not being able to achieve a higher playercount.
720p and 6vs 6 player count? with this feature, it doesn't look bad to get the 360 versión after all.
J_Allard said:
You'll have to ask selnor about the point of it but it doesn't mean what he said is wrong. The game uses the same Azure servers MS has set up for Live that the 360 and Xbone versions will. |
But say it didn't! Are you trying to say that other servers couldn't do the job? Servers are servers, be it MS Azure or Amazon,google etc. Respawn have rented them just like they could others! People making it out as something amazing and special cause Titanfall PC uses MS servers. Whatever next!
Ugh history repeats itself. Do we ever learn....
Resistance had what 32 player counts and Gears had 4 vs 4. Gears was reviewed better, sold better and guess what, had a bigger multiplayer community.
Intimate battles are sometimes better then being a face in the crowd.
Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
