ryuzaki57 said:
|
Aielyn said:
1. This isn't specifically about the Wii U, and your attempt to troll is not appreciated. That being said, the Wii U had quite a few third-party titles in 2013. And yet, with the exception of a couple of minor new IP titles and a couple of games delayed from 2013, third-party Wii U games in 2014 have not been announced at all. Even the ones we KNOW are coming. That is a fact. And it's exactly the same regarding the 3DS (1)
2. Ubisoft, maybe - although I find it doubtful that they have zero titles for the 3DS (2). Sega released three titles for 3DS in 2013 (3), not including Mario & Sonic at the Olympics. Namco Bandai released 21 3DS games in 2013. Tecmo Koei released two titles for 3DS in 2013. But good for you for trying to demolish a solid argument for why 3DS's upcoming lineup might be stronger than the current schedule suggests while putting forward the idea that Vita digital sales are higher with ZERO justification (4).
3. You've missed the point - it's not that there's no risk, it's that Nintendo isn't going to give them a low-risk high-return opportunity like working with Smash Bros, Zelda, etc, without those publishers giving something in return. I have zero doubt that the agreement reached that led to these co-development situations involved further agreements by those publishers to also make other games for the Wii U and/or 3DS. Kind of like how Sega got to use Mario in exchange for making Sonic Lost World (and possibly the third Sonic title, which may or may not have Mario in it) a Nintendo exclusive.
There is no inherent benefit to Nintendo to contract their biggest franchises out to third parties if those third parties give nothing else in return. Nintendo would have been better off using the money to make another studio for themselves, and develop it all in-house.
Do you really think Nintendo doesn't have studios capable of making Smash Bros (5), given that they've made previous Smash Bros games? They gave it to Namco Bandai for a reason. NB will have games coming to the Wii U.
|
(1) Do you know anything the majority of people don't? 3rd party publishers have announced PS4/X1/X360/PS3 games that release end 2014/early 2015. Why would they hide only the WiiU/3DS projects?
(2) Please remind me what Ubi has released for 3DS in 2013.
(3) Every single Sega game on Ninty platforms was a bomba. I hardly recon they want more bombas.
(4) see above
(5) Nintendo has delayed quite a few in-house games since WiiU launched. It's ovbvious they can't keep up with development. Anyway, there is not fact pointing at more 3rd party games for Ninty platforms at this point.
|
1) Nintendo can make the decision on that, and just because SOME have doesn't mean we know all of them. It applies for all platforms, but especially so for Nintendo platforms.
2) The way you word that is so you. You're trying to make it seem like Ubisoft never does anything with 3DS, even though we know that's not true. I'm not saying Ubisoft does have something, but your example sucks ass.
3) Another thing that is so you. You use the word "bomba" for Nintendo way too much. Source: The majority of Media Create/Famitsu/etc weekly sales threads. (Probably an exaggeration, but it wont be hard to see you saying bomba for Nintendo software while largely ignoring others)
4) Not even a real point
5) I do not agree with "can't keep up with development." That's just something you want to believe. For Wii U it may be true, but that is due to short time of experience with working with HD. Other delays are most likely (if not for sure confirmed) to be delays for quality assurance.