Spoiler alert: we didn't really attack Iraq over WMD.

For god's sake, attack Syria already. I have a ton of popcorn for that. Poor Syrians.

//And no, you didn't invade Iraq over rumors, it was purposeful lie.

Destroying WMD's were just a potential bonus to invading Iraq.

The Iraq War had far more to do with their sheltering and funding of Al Qaeda, Ridding Iraq of Saddam Husseins' tyrannical rule and more.

Don't think you know everything about what the USA does just because you watched 5 youtube conspiracy videos from delusional hate mongering idiots who cant even sufficiently back up their own claims with actual science and proof.

We're 'Merica and we do as we please We do not an excuse.

That was just a lie our government fed the public to have a reason to go over there.

But every war has an excuse! T_T

Of course the real reason we attacked Iraq, or what seems to be the real reason, is so silly nobody believes it.  Afterall, it wasn't oil or other natural resources either, that's all going to the chinese.

In reality it was simply.  Bush believed the US Military could be used to install just democracies in countries with dictators... and Iraq was just a good starting point.

4 ships? :D Unspeakable armada. No, that's not an invasion.

Since when is it our job to get rid of tyrannical rulers?

We've done nothing to get rid of Castro or his brother.  Or the horrible dictatorship of North Korea, arguably the most brutal presently in the world.  We did nothing to stop Chairman Mao and the communists from killing like 30 million of his own people in mid-20th century.  Same with the Soviets.  They brutally slaughtered millions of their own people, far more than the total death count of all that died in the Holocaust, we didn't go in and take any of them out.  The only reason we even got involved in WWII was because Japan bombed us at Pearl Harbor and we had no choice but to retaliate or face more bombings on US soil.

It's not as if the US has a clear history of cleansing the world of all the brutal dictators.  We pick and choose purely for selfish gains, of which most reasons for doing so clearly aren't shared with the public.

It does far more harm than good to police the world and tell other countries what they ought to or ought not to be doing.  We'd have a lot more allies and a lot less people elsewhere in the world wanting to kill US citizens if we just left other countries alone.  Treat others as you want to be treated.  The Golden Rule of foreign policy.  Retaliate when necessary, not just because something might happen someday.

You thread title is 100% wrong and misleading.

The USA have not attacked iraq by rumours but (just like always)by 100% fabricated lies with the purpose to reate a reason to attack
and invade Iraq.
Lies and rumours are by far not the same.

The Vietnam war was started the same way(Tonkin incident never happened)
The first Iraq war was started with a lie(the killing of little kuwait babies was just a faked a movie produced inside the usa with the daughter of the kuwait ambassador as nurse)
the spanish-american war was fabricated by the usa and william randolph hearst and the uss maine was never attacked but exploded from inside.

and Syria:The USA have a huge high tech spying and surveillance system with satellites,supercams,drones .They know exactly what is going on.They knew exactly that saddam had no bio weapons and they know 100% that Assad has not used chemical weapons.I he had,he already would have been attacked,that's why they are pushing these rumours right now and trying to make them look like the truth.
There is no reason for Assad to use these weapons as he is right now defeating the Qatar/Saudi sponsored terrorists and he'd never ever do something to give the usa a reason to invade his country.
The only people who need a chemical attack are western europe states(qatari gas pipeline through syria to become more independent from russian gas)usa-to control the oil and install their 700th military base on this planet(to make it easier attacking Iran and controlling the sea.
The scenario that is staged right now is very similar to that they used to get rid off ghaddafi in Lybia.

the most "funny" thing is.
Even a massive use of chemical weapons would never ever kill ,cripple and destroy the health of so many people as the depleted uranium ammo will do(that's how the usa are getting rid of their toxic atomic waste) that the us army is using and that will contaminate the region for the next 10000+ years.