No offense but the belief that Saddam had anything to do with Al Qaeda is moronic (I'm being generous). Saddam was a secular leader who put Militant Muslims to death, not work with them and there is zero evidence to the contrary. The Muslim extremists are more powerful now than ever thanks to the destabilization of Iraq and I suspect the traitors who rule America intended for that to be the case.

TLDR

Saddam working with Al Qaeda? LOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves_in_Iraq

Iraq has a lot of oil apparently, but I agree oil alone would be a stupid reason. There were other reasons.

Well, in such case he's either an idiot or a scumbag, or both. But I don't believe in good intentions in politics, so he's a scumbag after all, while your reasoning is as silly as "they went for oil". Who needs Iraqi oil in price of military operation of that scale? You simply buy it.

So what's the logic behind having democratic Middle East 10 years ago? Why Iraq? Why not Saudi Arabia? Why not 40 years ago? Why democratic Middle East favors national interests of the US in the first place? Why not, say, democratic Central America or whatever?

No, I don't belive theay are stupid (outside public talking heads, of course), they perfectly knew what they were doing.

There's something very fishy about these recent Syria chemical weapons claims.

Assad knows better than anyone else that using chemical weapons is the one thing Obama clearly defined as a "red line". And yet, just three days after official UN chemical inspectors arrived in Syria,he has nothing better to do than to kill hundreds of people using chemical weapons?

Assad isn't stupid, why on earth should he do something like this, right now, when chemical weapon inspectors have just arrived?

There were earlier reports about chemical weapons being used in Syria, and it turned out that it was probably the rebels who used them. So there's a good chance that it was actually the rebels who ordered the use the chemical weapons in this recent incident. They clearly have stronger motives.

There's something very fishy about these recent Syria chemical weapons claims.

Assad knows better than anyone else that using chemical weapons is the one thing Obama clearly defined as a "red line". And yet, just three days after official UN chemical inspectors arrived in Syria,he has nothing better to do than to kill hundreds of people using chemical weapons?

Assad isn't stupid, why on earth should he do something like this, right now, when chemical weapon inspectors have just arrived?

There were earlier reports about chemical weapons being used in Syria, and it turned out that it was probably the rebels who used them. So there's a good chance that it was actually the rebels who ordered the use the chemical weapons in this recent incident. They clearly have stronger motives.

Creating chaos within certain territory is a valid goal, why not? The only question remains is why?

Say, I do believe that this's the only goal of Arab Spring, unlike Iraq, which might have had some sort of order in mind after invasion -- didn't work out -- or rather plans have changed due to bad economic conjecture.