U.S attacked Iraq over rumors of W.M.D's

[SxyxS]

You thread title is 100% wrong and misleading.

The USA have not attacked iraq by rumours but (just like always)by 100% fabricated lies with the purpose to reate a reason to attack
and invade Iraq.
Lies and rumours are by far not the same.

The Vietnam war was started the same way(Tonkin incident never happened)
The first Iraq war was started with a lie(the killing of little kuwait babies was just a faked a movie produced inside the usa with the daughter of the kuwait ambassador as nurse)
the spanish-american war was fabricated by the usa and william randolph hearst and the uss maine was never attacked but exploded from inside.

and Syria:The USA have a huge high tech spying and surveillance system with satellites,supercams,drones .They know exactly what is going on.They knew exactly that saddam had no bio weapons and they know 100% that Assad has not used chemical weapons.I he had,he already would have been attacked,that's why they are pushing these rumours right now and trying to make them look like the truth.
There is no reason for Assad to use these weapons as he is right now defeating the Qatar/Saudi sponsored terrorists and he'd never ever do something to give the usa a reason to invade his country.
The only people who need a chemical attack are western europe states(qatari gas pipeline through syria to become more independent from russian gas)usa-to control the oil and install their 700th military base on this planet(to make it easier attacking Iran and controlling the sea.
The scenario that is staged right now is very similar to that they used to get rid off ghaddafi in Lybia.

the most "funny" thing is.
Even a massive use of chemical weapons would never ever kill ,cripple and destroy the health of so many people as the depleted uranium ammo will do(that's how the usa are getting rid of their toxic atomic waste) that the us army is using and that will contaminate the region for the next 10000+ years.