zarx said:
RenCutypoison said:
zarx said: Why the fuck would MS not implement it? |
Because they already spended 3 billions in R&D for APU that boosts native hypervisor and synchronous(ness ?) of the three OS.
They made a choice.
|
They made a bad one then AMD have had perfectly servicable Hypervisor support since 2007, and so have MS at least in the server space. hUMA is a technology that should be built into the hardware already. It should be a no brainer, maybe the eSRAM and the "move engines" is the problem.
|
Even the best APU of the world couldn't do everything at once.
And for hypervisor on server, it runs multiple OS on Hardware level, but not simultaneously. (or at least I never heard of such think, but I can ask my Hardware teach' next week (a skilled linux dev) )