It's quite a specific mistake to make. You could forgive him saying 8 times or 10 times or even 12 times, but 3 times? There's more to this than meets the eye.

There were some games that were - categorically, without a shadow of a doubt - running on Xbox One hardware. It'll come as little surprise to learn that first party software was more likely to be showcased running on the new console, with Turn 10's Forza Motorsport 5 the most high profile title we saw that was visibly operating on the actual console.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-xbox-one

Somethings that I find curious and not genuine.
1. I don't trust Phil Spencer, he doesn't seem to believe his own hype. He doesn't even know how powerful the Xbone is.

2. Killer Instinct was a niche arcade classic game and probably only one person in the audience outside of Fallon and Quest Love know what that game is let alone that it is on the Xbox One if this is their first time hearing about it resurfacing.

3. Why didn't they showcase the Xbone in its case just like this at E3? Scared the gamers might not be impressed?

4. Killer Instinct is not a free download, Jago's arcade playthrough is free, everything else is payable. He needs to state the facts because the chances are the audience doesnt know or even care. With casuals you need to be blunt about the product and tell the truth or else you're taking advantage of their ignorance. Specifics are key because one thing I've learned from working in retail is that if you miss a point and let the consumer buy the product out of ignorance, consumers come back pissed or confused and you're lucky if you get to give them an explaination as to why they should keep the product.

Wrogn.FLOPS are FLOPS.

The difference in architecture is how much it is efficient to use these FLOPS... I mean any in architecture in the best case scenario can use 100% of the FLOPS but there is no best case scenario. In real games a old architecture uses less of these FLOPS at the same due limitations (specifics processs can't be made in parallel, etc) and a new architecture can use more these FLOPS at the same  (the process that can't be made in parallel now is possible).

That's the difference in architecture... efficient in the use of FLOPS.

But FLOPS are FLOPS... FLOPS = FLoating-point Operations Per Second... it is like Km/h is Km/h and there is no way to be diffrence between cars but a new can can reach the top speed more easly than a old one (or not... there are bad new architecture like P3 to P4) ... and that will never end.

KI was a massive arcade success that was ported to Snes to enjoy more success. While KI was in its prime of sucess MK was lurking in the dark with some horrible iterations like MK4.

A exemple... the RSX is supposed to be close a GeForce 7800... the Xenon is a better GPU than RSX... and the GeForce 7800 are in the 12.3 to 15.9 VPs... I'm pretty sure Xenon will be over 15 VP at that table.

In fact most forum and techs guys uses X1900 for X360 (~25VP) and GTX 7900 (~22VP) for PS3 but I think that a little exagerated... I think it is more in line with ~20VP (360) and 16VP(PS3)

A good article about that: http://br.dir.groups.yahoo.com/group/gamejutsu/message/2690

Edit - lol sorry I forget the article is in Portugue... look just the graph.

Using the 20VPs for X360:

PS4: ~7x X360
Xbone: ~5x X360

Only comparing GPU power.

so if wii u is 0.5x more powerful than 360.... so xbone is twice as powerful than wii u.....

I loved KI but it was never a massive arcade success.

Killer Instinct is a free download?

This doesn't sound like a game, but a demo.....MS could do so much more with Rare, looks like one of my biggest reasons to own a One just went out the window...

It was ported from Arcade to Snes because it was a huge success. And it kept that wave still in Snes

Compare it to MK sales during their respective release window.