oniyide said:
Conegamer said:
Kresnik said:
tbone51 said:
god dammit lol. I didnt kno ni no kuni was on ds??? remakes should be exclusives i think. I mean games like pokemon heartgold/soulsilver should be classified as its own imo.
|
Remakes, yeah I agree, but ports are harder to justify. I'd liken DKCR 3D to something like Atelier Totori Plus. Yes, it's an expanded handheld version of a home console game with some new letters at the end of the title, buf it's only exclusive if you treat that word like Sales2099 does (i.e. the PC space is different to the home console space which in turn is different to the handheld space. So Minecraft would be a 360 exclusive and Sly Cooper a PS3 exclusive).
Also, I don't know what the deal with Ni No Kuni is. I thought the DS version was different to the PS3 version, but maybe not!
|
I think that it's like Graces ---> Graces F, i.e. the same game with expanded content.
|
its not like that at all, you're comparing a portable game to a PS3 one. THe PS3 version of Ninokuni was made from the ground up for PS3. Different engine assets everything.
|
Well from what I've read, the DS version sorta ends roughly around the half-way mark, and the PS3 continues the story afterwards. In addition, the battle systems are different as one involves drawing runes, which was the big hook for me in the DS version, over a more "traditional" battle system for the PS3 version.
They may not be exactly the same, but they aren't different enough to be "seperate" games if half the stuff is almost identical. It's a difficult scenario, I can't think of another case like it.