By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Need for Speed MW U "Graphics seem slightly worse compared to other versions"

Cobretti2 on 19 March 2013

Meh I think I'll believe the developer over some random review.

Also if it is slightly worst/better or the same I could not careless as the two player features is what will sell this game for father and son combos.



 

 

Around the Network
ninjablade on 19 March 2013
curl-6 said:
hunter_alien said:
curl-6 said:

hunter_alien said:

 Its clear as day now, that no game on the WiiU will show that its objectivly far more powerfull than the 360 or PS3, just like the Wii never prooved that is is more powerfull than an Xbox.

The Wii showed it as more powerful than the Xbox wth Mario Galaxy, Jett Rocket, and Modern Warfare 3.

And the idea that the Wii U is maxed out within five months of its release is ludicrous, anyone who thinks so clearly knows very little about game development.


I havent stated that, dont [put it in my mouth. Yet we still dont see any games on the WiiU that looks as good as halo4/Uncharted 3, like it or not, and at the moment its pretty much guaranteed IMO that much better looking games wont come to the WiiU.

I havent played Jett Rocket, so I wont comment on that, but lets be honest neither MG or MW3 on the Wii didnt do anything far better than what SC4/H2/D3/HL2 did on the original Xbox... lets dont fool ourselves, OK?

Nintendo will never have any advantage in the graphical department, and I am baffeled that with the WiiU, for Nintendo fans graphics do matter all the sudden. I believed that gameplay is all that mattares. Or was I wrong?

I was addressing claims across the thread, not you specifically, with that part. It look 5/7 years to get Uncharted 3/Halo 4 out of the PS3/360, Wii U hasn't even been out for one year, and nobody has even really tried to push its capabilities with an exclusive yet.

Mario Galaxy pushed tons of multitexturing (star bits, coins, metal, ice, water, lava, etc) reflective and refractive materials, rim lighting on pretty much everything, high quality particle effects, and tricks like fur shading and heat distortion, and did it all at 60fps; no Xbox game did as much. And Modern Warfare 3 pushed the Wii's CPU and memory very hard, and the Wii has a better CPU and more RAM than the Xbox.

And gameplay matters far more than graphics and always has; this won't change for me. If I really wanted graphics I'd save up for a nuclear-powered gaming PC cooled by angel's tears. ;)

lol, uncharted 2, GOW3 and kill zone 2 maxed out the ps3 5-4 years ago, sure games look better, but nothing by a huge margin. and you have no idea what your talking about ninja gaiden, splinter cell and conkers bad furry hair day look  much better the mario glaxy techincally, wii couldn't even do proagramable shaders, not mention sould caliber 2 was running 720p= better looking then anyhting on wii.



Th3PANO on 19 March 2013
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
hunter_alien said:
curl-6 said:

hunter_alien said:

 Its clear as day now, that no game on the WiiU will show that its objectivly far more powerfull than the 360 or PS3, just like the Wii never prooved that is is more powerfull than an Xbox.

The Wii showed it as more powerful than the Xbox wth Mario Galaxy, Jett Rocket, and Modern Warfare 3.

And the idea that the Wii U is maxed out within five months of its release is ludicrous, anyone who thinks so clearly knows very little about game development.


I havent stated that, dont [put it in my mouth. Yet we still dont see any games on the WiiU that looks as good as halo4/Uncharted 3, like it or not, and at the moment its pretty much guaranteed IMO that much better looking games wont come to the WiiU.

I havent played Jett Rocket, so I wont comment on that, but lets be honest neither MG or MW3 on the Wii didnt do anything far better than what SC4/H2/D3/HL2 did on the original Xbox... lets dont fool ourselves, OK?

Nintendo will never have any advantage in the graphical department, and I am baffeled that with the WiiU, for Nintendo fans graphics do matter all the sudden. I believed that gameplay is all that mattares. Or was I wrong?

I was addressing claims across the thread, not you specifically, with that part. It look 5/7 years to get Uncharted 3/Halo 4 out of the PS3/360, Wii U hasn't even been out for one year, and nobody has even really tried to push its capabilities with an exclusive yet.

Mario Galaxy pushed tons of multitexturing (star bits, coins, metal, ice, water, lava, etc) reflective and refractive materials, rim lighting on pretty much everything, high quality particle effects, and tricks like fur shading and heat distortion, and did it all at 60fps; no Xbox game did as much. And Modern Warfare 3 pushed the Wii's CPU and memory very hard, and the Wii has a better CPU and more RAM than the Xbox.

And gameplay matters far more than graphics and always has; this won't change for me. If I really wanted graphics I'd save up for a nuclear-powered gaming PC cooled by angel's tears. ;)

lol, uncharted 2, GOW3 and kill zone 2 maxed out the ps3 5-4 years ago, sure games look better, but nothing by a huge margin. and you have no idea what your talking about ninja gaiden, splinter cell and conkers bad furry hair day look  much better the mario glaxy techincally, wii couldn't even do proagramable shaders, not mention sould caliber 2 was running 720p= better looking then anyhting on wii.


if they can get some better effect on later games like uncharted 3 then it wasn't outmaxed with uncharted 1. you have to consider that uncharted 3 was bigger then the first one AND had better effects, lightning etc . so no, it wasn't maxed out



Th3PANO on 19 March 2013
ninjablade said:
the_dengle said:
There were a LOT of PS3 games ported from 360 that looked terrible by comparison to the originals. You guys mean to tell me it's because the PS3 was weaker than the 360?



ps3 in some ways is  weaker then 360, if you asked which was the over all more powerful console, i would say 360, just because most multiplatform games look better on it, everybody agree there prett much on par.


oh, and part of the reason why the xbox 3rd party titels looked better and ran better? they were build for the xbox and ported to the ps 3. you have no idea like always. .....nobody takes you serious.



curl-6 on 19 March 2013
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
hunter_alien said:
curl-6 said:

hunter_alien said:

 Its clear as day now, that no game on the WiiU will show that its objectivly far more powerfull than the 360 or PS3, just like the Wii never prooved that is is more powerfull than an Xbox.

The Wii showed it as more powerful than the Xbox wth Mario Galaxy, Jett Rocket, and Modern Warfare 3.

And the idea that the Wii U is maxed out within five months of its release is ludicrous, anyone who thinks so clearly knows very little about game development.


I havent stated that, dont [put it in my mouth. Yet we still dont see any games on the WiiU that looks as good as halo4/Uncharted 3, like it or not, and at the moment its pretty much guaranteed IMO that much better looking games wont come to the WiiU.

I havent played Jett Rocket, so I wont comment on that, but lets be honest neither MG or MW3 on the Wii didnt do anything far better than what SC4/H2/D3/HL2 did on the original Xbox... lets dont fool ourselves, OK?

Nintendo will never have any advantage in the graphical department, and I am baffeled that with the WiiU, for Nintendo fans graphics do matter all the sudden. I believed that gameplay is all that mattares. Or was I wrong?

I was addressing claims across the thread, not you specifically, with that part. It look 5/7 years to get Uncharted 3/Halo 4 out of the PS3/360, Wii U hasn't even been out for one year, and nobody has even really tried to push its capabilities with an exclusive yet.

Mario Galaxy pushed tons of multitexturing (star bits, coins, metal, ice, water, lava, etc) reflective and refractive materials, rim lighting on pretty much everything, high quality particle effects, and tricks like fur shading and heat distortion, and did it all at 60fps; no Xbox game did as much. And Modern Warfare 3 pushed the Wii's CPU and memory very hard, and the Wii has a better CPU and more RAM than the Xbox.

And gameplay matters far more than graphics and always has; this won't change for me. If I really wanted graphics I'd save up for a nuclear-powered gaming PC cooled by angel's tears. ;)

lol, uncharted 2, GOW3 and kill zone 2 maxed out the ps3 5-4 years ago, sure games look better, but nothing by a huge margin. and you have no idea what your talking about ninja gaiden, splinter cell and conkers bad furry hair day look  much better the mario glaxy techincally, wii couldn't even do proagramable shaders, not mention sould caliber 2 was running 720p= better looking then anyhting on wii.

UC2, GOW3 and KZ2 all came out 2-3 years into the PS3's lifespan; Wii U hasn't been out even a quarter as long.

The Wii didn't have GPU programmable shaders but it was better at multitexturing, effects like EMBM, CPU performance, RAM speed, and RAM capacity. Mario Galaxy couldn't be done on Xbox without cutbacks, nor could Jett Rocket or Modern Warfare 3.



Around the Network
Mnementh on 19 March 2013
zippy said:
I wonder when Ninjablade will make an appearance ;)

Didn't took long.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

ninjablade on 19 March 2013
Th3PANO said:
ninjablade said:
the_dengle said:
There were a LOT of PS3 games ported from 360 that looked terrible by comparison to the originals. You guys mean to tell me it's because the PS3 was weaker than the 360?



ps3 in some ways is  weaker then 360, if you asked which was the over all more powerful console, i would say 360, just because most multiplatform games look better on it, everybody agree there prett much on par.


oh, and part of the reason why the xbox 3rd party titels looked better and ran better? they were build for the xbox and ported to the ps 3. you have no idea like always. .....nobody takes you serious.

yea even some games that lead on ps3 look better on 360, dead space, need for speed, they always end up on par or better on 360.



NeilStrauss on 19 March 2013

This doesn´t sound right, why Nintendo WiiU cannot do better than two dying 7 years olde consoles? makes no sense.



Trunkin on 19 March 2013

Sorry, but haven't we already seen with our own eyes the visual improvements made to the Wii U version? Was all of that a lie? Is this Aliens:CM all over again?



Roma on 19 March 2013

LOL Ninjablade trying hard as usual

OT: I will wait until we get some footage before I decide what to believe



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(