Considering the rest of us have to tolerate the words "unrealistic", "appaling" and "robbery", I think you can humour me.
Not really, you're always like this. The attributes I'm using are actually relating to my points, whereas your are simply insulting my PoV.
I'll concede I'm being rude (it's on purpose, though; don't worry, :P), but you ought to get off that high pedestal. Saying anything is appaling is not an objective description. It's about as bad as calling anything ridiculous.
Saying that what Nintendo does is equivalent to robbing people, though? Now, that's outright insulting. It's completely unnecessary and just offensive to anyone who sees value in these games. It's extremely inflammatory and, even if you genuinely feel such a sentiment, can be phrased in a much less troll-ish terms.
Since this won't get us anywhere, though, I'll amend my statement:
"Until the market shows Mario or even Kirby at $50 making less revenue than any one of those cheap online games, your argument is wrong and disconnected with how consumers see it."
I hope wrong isn't too strong a word for you, too.