I'm sure I own a lot. Code of Princess, Sakura Samurai, Mutant Mudds, Might Switch Force come to mind. I gave a lot of ne IP's a try with my 3DS. I'll get back to you after I look at it.

Yup. Nintendo just has a long history of owning the entire handheld market, it was never going to change over night. There mindshare with games like Mario is just too strong. Sony, after heavily relying on 3rd parties for too long, is now creating the 1st party franchises they should have years ago and their popularity has to be given a chance to grow in multiple venues.

The fact the Vita is significantly more costly doesn't help the situation either. Or at least the consumer is still conditioned to THINK it costs much more. Sony needs to teach them that its really not, but god knows their marketing departement is ran by monkeys.

Except this time things are much worse than their last attept, i.e. PSP. They're literally making negative progress.

Sakura Samurai, Mutant Mudds, Dillon Rolling Western, Theathrythm Final Fantasy, Bravely Default, The Denpa Man, Heroes of Ruin, Rhythm Thief, Liberation Maiden, Fractured Soul, Mighty Switch Force, Pushmo, Freakyforms Deluxe, Code of Princess, Bomb Monkey, Ghost Recon Shadow Wars, Doctor Lautrec and the forgotten Knights, Nano Assault, James Noir Hollywood crimes, Dream Trigger 3d, Steel Diver.

I would also like to know why do you think the Vita is not selling better.

I honestly believe the one and only reason why the Vita is not doing as well as the PSP is because NIN dropped price and Sony stubbornly refused to follow suite, at least as soon as they did. When Nintendo slashed price they set precedent that demands all others follow suite. No one wants to be a 3DS early adopter with the Vita. What I mean by that I think many are holding out (more so than normally) because they are afraid the second they get it it will drop in price, and they will feel shafted. I know I would too. Everyone knows they have to do so in order to compete with 3DS now so many find it unnessessary to buy it now, knowing it will cheaper just a few months from now.

Sure, blame Nintendo for Sony's failure.

Also, do you want Sony to go bankrupt?

Bravely Default is not even out in the US or EU yet. Its suppose to be games you own, not all that you know that fit the criteria. And many are forgeting the part where I asked for discriptions of said game. Preferably platform(IE is it a digital download or retail), how it plays, and how you would rate such a game.

I see where going but its deeper than just a console game on a handheld. There is Metal Gear on Consoles and Metal Gear on handhelds. Though the are series, each offers a different xxperience. Console Metal Gear is the tried and true formula everybody knows. In regards to Handheld MG they took a different approach. They alot of Monster Hunter, alittle bit of Pokemon and infused it MG to create something not found in the console versions. Peace Walker is completely different design than any console MG. Final Fantasy also does this With the crystal chronicle series. Its about creating a different xxperience to consoles which SONY and Vita have not done.

Outside of a new adventure for drake, what xxactly is different design wise? How about AC? blop? What are they doing to createva xxperience different than consoles?

What an incredible tale. Again, you are ignoring what consumers dictate. Its simpler than that. Sony cant afford to lose money on it, cause they are buried in debt with problems to finance themselves.

Nintendo did what needed to be done to save their product and flip it into a sucess. It wasnt nintendo that wanted to do it, it was the consumers that dictated it. You can only blame Sony for not beeing able to predict it after what happened to the 3DS.

The thing is, Nintendo is known to come up with game play ideas then toss their series into it, so most of them are designed based on a portable platform instead of trying to be a home console experience, so I'm not sure how that even calculates into your equation.