Mr Khan said:
Kantor said:
Mr Khan said: No-one was ever suggesting he was some sort of Montgomery Burns-esque plutocratic supervillain. His fault is more that he's out of touch (like the thing with the dog on the roof of a car. It's not deliberate animal cruelty, it's just kinda dumb) Politicians are people too, and people tend to be generally decent when you get to know them |
But they are suggesting that.
Everyone says "He strapped a dog to the roof of a car, and we can't have a sociopath like that as President!"
This just gives some sort of balance. He is at worst, a decent human being who doesn't share your ideas. Fine. Stop lambasting him as the anti-Christ (not directed at you, but at his critics in general).
|
We'll stop when *they* stop suggesting that Obama should share the fate of Osama.
|
I don't think anybody has ever said that.
Indeed, if you look at Obama vs Romney ads, the Romney ads attack Obama for being well-intentioned but wrong. The Obama ads attack Romney for being evil, hating poor people, and so on.