lilbroex, do you actually try to look like a fool or does this happen by accident?

1st Devs tell you you all you want to hear so that you buy their game. A dev saying the next release will be better than the prior ones is not surprising. We jus have to see it first. I am not saying the games look worse, we just have to see it.

2nd The GCN was not as powerful as the Xbox. This isn't even up for debate. The best looking games last gen were Doom 3, Halo CE, Halo 2, Half Life 2, Splinter Cell or Panzer Dragoon Orta. Most of them were (console) exclusive for the Xbox. Even games like Enclave were above most GCN games. The spec sheet obviously proves you wrong without a doubt.

Eurogamer shamefully twisted the quote
Here is the real quote.

The >>game<< is “easily on a par [with Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions],” says Lycett.

“We’re still very much getting to grips with what we can make the hardware do [...]. So it’s hard to really answer that right now, but yeah, I think once we’ve had a bit more time finding our way around it, chances are you can look to >>do things that you may not be able to do before<<.”

wtf

Eurogamer shamefully twisted the quote
Here is the real quote.

The >>game<< is “easily on a par [with Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions],” says Lycett.

“We’re still very much getting to grips with what we can make the hardware do [...]. So it’s hard to really answer that right now, but yeah, I think once we’ve had a bit more time finding our way around it, chances are you can look to >>do things that you may not be able to do before<<.”
#3

bug

The Sony fans in this thread really need to think about the future in realistic terms. Sony is not going to release a PS4 that is leaps and bounds ahead of this gen in terms of power. They're hurting really bad right now and need to make a profit on hardware out of the gate.

Next gen hardware is only going to be marginally more powerful than this gen.

However, I could be wrong - since Sony didn't learn from the PS3 with the Vita...

The Wii U is just a Wii with a U duct taped to it.

I heard they used super glue... see even on that the reports are not clear... :(

I found it is up for debate, and he argued it pretty well. And this is from a person who doesn't always agree with him.

I think in this case you look more like the fool because you just state your opinion whereas he actually goes into details about why the games outperformed those you listed.

Joke's on you.

#1.  You should actually read the original article which shows that the Eurogamer article was bogus flamebait.  Fitting that you would continue to ignore that and cosign the Eurogamer article which deliberately spun a nuetral quote into a Wii U knock.  Really says a lot about you pezus... though nothing any of us didn't already know.

#2. I haven't seen any of those high end engines at work but if you expect Sony and MS to be on the bleeding edge of graphics again remember this comment and don't cry when the system is too expensive, don't cry when there are too few games because dev costs are too high, don't cry when games take even longer to come out because teams need to add more shaders, and don't cry when Sony bleeds money yet again (I reckon MS can handle it!). 

If I'm right about PS4/720 not being a huge leap over current gen, I can't wait to see how you change your tune all of a sudden.

Would be news if it wasn't as powerful as the ps3. Multiplats still are 720p like Arkham city and AC3.

Eurogamer = piece of shit website.

Original article:

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/13/sonic-all-stars-racing-transforms-on-wii-u

They were clearly talking about THE GAME being on par with the other console versions.