By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Another Developer says: Wii U graphics are “on par with PS3, maybe better” *Ediot* Eurogamer has been naughty...

If Wii U has better graphics capabilities than PS3, then ZombiU has no excuse for how horrible it looks. Seriously, that game looks like first-gen 360 from 2005. It looks horrible. Ubisoft needs to really polish that up a bit before November 18th... Yikes



 

Around the Network
pezus said:
Kenology said:
The Sony fans in this thread really need to think about the future in realistic terms. Sony is not going to release a PS4 that is leaps and bounds ahead of this gen in terms of power. They're hurting really bad right now and need to make a profit on hardware out of the gate.

Next gen hardware is only going to be marginally more powerful than this gen.

However, I could be wrong - since Sony didn't learn from the PS3 with the Vita...

Explain Watch_Dogs, Star Wars 1313. UE4 to me then. Do you think Epic would design a whole engine that could only be used by the PC?

Watch Dogs was hinted at coming out on PS360, wasn't it? Star Wars 1313 is UE3.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

pezus said:


#1 Ok, again attacking me instead of debating my points. I could care jack shit about this article as I am not basing my argument around it.

#2 Of course I won't cry. I personally would prefer for it to be expensive again (because I can afford it) with next-gen graphics. This argument is contradictory lol...where did most of the big games release this gen? That's right, on the most powerful consoles. So...I couldn't care less about some devs struggling to release one game here and there, at least it's better than a mountain of shovelware.

I know you won't be right lol...as I said, there is evidence.

#1. Nobody's attacking you pezus.  Did you say yourself that you bring negativity to Nintendo threads just to serve as a balancing act?  Don't try to play victim, I didn't attack you in any way.

#2. Obviously some of the biggest games came out on the HD consoles because there were two of them vs. one Wii.  But you're wrong, most of the biggest games came out on WIi.  Also, I'm glad you can afford five hundred and ninety nine US dollars but a system won't have mass market appeal if only the pezus' of the world are buying it.  You made this about you personally, not about the market - which is what I'm talking about, the mass market.  The PS2 had a mountain of shovelware.



Kenology said:
pezus said:


#1 Ok, again attacking me instead of debating my points. I could care jack shit about this article as I am not basing my argument around it.

#2 Of course I won't cry. I personally would prefer for it to be expensive again (because I can afford it) with next-gen graphics. This argument is contradictory lol...where did most of the big games release this gen? That's right, on the most powerful consoles. So...I couldn't care less about some devs struggling to release one game here and there, at least it's better than a mountain of shovelware.

I know you won't be right lol...as I said, there is evidence.

#1. Nobody's attacking you pezus.  Did you say yourself that you bring negativity to Nintendo threads just to serve as a balancing act?  Don't try to play victim, I didn't attack you in any way.

#2. Obviously some of the biggest games came out on the HD consoles because there were two of them vs. one Wii.  But you're wrong, most of the biggest games came out on WIi.  Also, I'm glad you can afford five hundred and ninety nine US dollars but a system won't have mass market appeal if only the pezus' of the world are buying it.  You made this about you personally, not about the market - which is what I'm talking about, the mass market.  The PS2 had a mountain of shovelware.

How wasnt the HD market not mass market when there are 125m+ consoles out there?



pezus said:
Mr Khan said:

Watch Dogs was hinted at coming out on PS360, wasn't it? Star Wars 1313 is UE3.

But clearly the footage we saw had no way of running on current gen consoles. Star Wars 1313 implements pretty much everything UE3 has to offer, plus Lucasarts' own technology. It amazes me that this is UE3 but it's also obvious here that it's a next gen game.

Well, the thing is we can't know until someone tries. Like how the best GC games couldn't be run on Xbox, not necessarily because Xbox was weaker but because of tremendous architectural differences. It could be the same here. Wii U architecture has a lot of potential from what we've heard, but how that translates to being able to run PC games is unknown.

But should not be dismissed out of hand.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network

I love how we started out as "Bah, no one argues about this!"

Lol. xD



Train wreck said:

How wasnt the HD market not mass market when there are 125m+ consoles out there?

I never said it wasn't mass market.  I don't know what you're talking about.



pezus said:


#1 Don't worry, I won't report you lulz. I bring balance yes, which you may see as negativity but I see as realistic thinking. 

#2. There will again be two powerful consoles and one Nintendo console. Sorry to break it to you.
PS2 had everything. Wii had Nintendo and mountains of shovelware. That is the difference. Still waiting for your explanation for Watch_Dogs, UE4, FF. Would they show that only to make it look like that on PC? Bah, if you really believe that you will get a reality check in a few months anyway.

#1.  You have no grounds to report anything but feel free if it makes you feel better.  I don't remember the thread, but you admitted to being negative in Nintendo threads on purpose.  You did.

#2.  lol, whatever pezus!  I don't know anything about Watch Dogs on UE4, never seen them in action or anything.  I already told you that.  Plus, I don't really know where you're going with that.  I already entertained the posibility of PS4 and 720 being a "huge" leap from this gen in my first response to you - which you quoted and responded to yourself.  Don't know what you're getting at man, really.



@happydolphin,

he argued pretty well?! He just came up with PR nonsense said from the guys making this game exclusively.
Awesome argumentation. Epic said Gears of War could not be done on PS3, because of lack of RAM. This is just as well argued then?

http://news.softpedia.com/news/PlayStation3-Too-Low-Tech-For-Gears-of-Wars-38877.shtml

Everybody and their mothers know that the Xbox was the most powerful console last gen. That is not an oppinion as you called it. It is obvious if you read the spec sheet. There is not category the GCN can match the Xbox. Disc seize, HDD, CPU, GPU, RAM. I mean, the GCN was reasonably powered for this time, the Xbox was just overpowered for its time.

That is why the Wii was compared to the original Xbox at first.
http://www.gameguru.in/features/2007/23/xbox-vs-wii-a-comparative-analysis/



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

I am actually interested in that racing game, all of a sudden. Seems interesting how they went with the Diddy Kong Racing style and include cars, planes and boats. Combine that with remote play and I'm basically sold already O.o