By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Digital Foundry vs. Wii U at E3!

I'm all for graphic improvements over today's hardware. Even looking at the likes of Uncharted you can see there is plenty of room for improvement. We are far from the limit. Production costs are a bit of an issue but I think the market is big enough for the main companies - the ones that matter - to keep releasing games far better aesthetically than the ones we already have. The lesser ones might move to tablets and smartphones, but I really doubt you're going to see, say, your next Call of Duty based around the next iPad.

We won't have photorealism next gen by the way. Epic themselves said you need hardware some two thousand times stronger than today's for it. It may even be impossible with electron-based semiconductors since some recent research shows transistors it will likely start showing irretrievable loss of information when computers are a thousand times faster than today's. But that's another talk entirely.

Maybe this whole thread is about damage control since we now know the Wii U's capabilities (or lack thereof...)



 

 

 

 

 

Around the Network

This entire thread is crazy.

OP is 100% false and makes Wii U look bad when in reality those are 60FPS games and its been proven that many if not all those 3rd party ports look clearly better on Wii U than Ps360.

Wii U is next gen. It is better. 1st year ports already show better details while using a gamepad. Imagine when the hardware matures and/or a game not even using the gamepad.

The real questions won't be answered until 2014/15 after all next-gen is out and having new games fully built on that hardware and engines. That's where Wii U will either be a wii-pete or hold its own. We can't even begin that argument until 2013 when more finalized specs/rumors are out.



pezus said:
megaman79 said:
If graphics really mattered why do console game sales consistently beat PC game sales?

Source? I seem to recall the PC market being almost bigger than consoles combined. That doesn't have a lot to do with graphics, but still...

Yeah, all those people buying slot machine games running them on their XP desktops with a 1GHz single core 512MB RAM and integrated 32MB graphics



Snesboy said:
pezus said:
megaman79 said:
If graphics really mattered why do console game sales consistently beat PC game sales?

Source? I seem to recall the PC market being almost bigger than consoles combined. That doesn't have a lot to do with graphics, but still...

Yeah, all those people buying slot machine games running them on their XP desktops with a 1GHz single core 512MB RAM and integrated 32MB graphics

LOL. You almost perfectly described my PC there.

I have a 96MB integrated graphics card.



Play4Fun said:
LOL. You almost perfectly described my PC there.

I have a 96MB integrated graphics card.


Holy shit...

PC Elite right here!!



Around the Network
superchunk said:
This entire thread is crazy.

OP is 100% false and makes Wii U look bad when in reality those are 60FPS games and its been proven that many if not all those 3rd party ports look clearly better on Wii U than Ps360.

Wii U is next gen. It is better. 1st year ports already show better details while using a gamepad. Imagine when the hardware matures and/or a game not even using the gamepad.

The real questions won't be answered until 2014/15 after all next-gen is out and having new games fully built on that hardware and engines. That's where Wii U will either be a wii-pete or hold its own. We can't even begin that argument until 2013 when more finalized specs/rumors are out.


Source?



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!