By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Digital Foundry vs. Wii U at E3!

Panama said:
Was hoping for Rayman Legends to hit 60fps like Origins.

it does, DF is sources are videos of gameplay, not direct footage.

http://gamersyde.com/stream_rayman_legends_e3_demo-27305_en.html



Around the Network

There is no doubt in my mind now that wii U is just a little stronger than the PS3, like I originally thought. A lot of factors pointed towards it and the only other possibility is that devs were given a weaker console to dev for, to be on the safe side.

It's not just DF's article, a lot of things, Pikmin looked great but it didn't look next-gen, same goes Batman game. I am sure the PC version looks a lot better for batman.



Sounds good. Of course, these things are still in development, so they'll be more polished come launch.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

pezus said:

But better graphics does not equal photorealism. Games can still be as cartoony as they wish, just much more so.

I know that. But that's what APM seems to want and that's why I said we had differing opinions.



mantlepiecek said:
There is no doubt in my mind now that wii U is just a little stronger than the PS3, like I originally thought. A lot of factors pointed towards it and the only other possibility is that devs were given a weaker console to dev for, to be on the safe side.

It's not just DF's article, a lot of things, Pikmin looked great but it didn't look next-gen, same goes Batman game. I am sure the PC version looks a lot better for batman.

DF's article was largely confirmed to be bullshit, and then on the other side we have quick ports and a game ported up from the Wii. People see what they want to see, i suppose.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
Mr Khan said:

DF's article was largely confirmed to be bullshit, and then on the other side we have quick ports and a game ported up from the Wii. People see what they want to see, i suppose.




Mr Khan said:
mantlepiecek said:
There is no doubt in my mind now that wii U is just a little stronger than the PS3, like I originally thought. A lot of factors pointed towards it and the only other possibility is that devs were given a weaker console to dev for, to be on the safe side.

It's not just DF's article, a lot of things, Pikmin looked great but it didn't look next-gen, same goes Batman game. I am sure the PC version looks a lot better for batman.

DF's article was largely confirmed to be bullshit, and then on the other side we have quick ports and a game ported up from the Wii. People see what they want to see, i suppose.

So you are going to believe that the wii u is much more powerful than the current-gen consoles based on what?

And Pikmin is in no way ported from wii. Who the hell said that? It looks great, but not next-gen. Even if it was started on wii, they started again on the wiiu.

Why do you think DF's article is bs?



mantlepiecek said:
Mr Khan said:
mantlepiecek said:
There is no doubt in my mind now that wii U is just a little stronger than the PS3, like I originally thought. A lot of factors pointed towards it and the only other possibility is that devs were given a weaker console to dev for, to be on the safe side.

It's not just DF's article, a lot of things, Pikmin looked great but it didn't look next-gen, same goes Batman game. I am sure the PC version looks a lot better for batman.

DF's article was largely confirmed to be bullshit, and then on the other side we have quick ports and a game ported up from the Wii. People see what they want to see, i suppose.

So you are going to believe that the wii u is much more powerful than the current-gen consoles based on what?

And Pikmin is in no way ported from wii. Who the hell said that? It looks great, but not next-gen. Even if it was started on wii, they started again on the wiiu.

Why do you think DF's article is bs?

Read through the GAF thread that Nsanity linked. Specifically around page 4 or 5 or so we start getting countervailing analysis that largely sorts their stuff out.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

NintendoPie said:
pezus said:

But better graphics does not equal photorealism. Games can still be as cartoony as they wish, just much more so.

I know that. But that's what APM seems to want and that's why I said we had differing opinions.

No, I said I want games aiming for realism to looks photorealistic, not every game.



BasilZero said:
Andrespetmonkey said:

No, I said I want games aiming for realism to looks photorealistic, not every game.


Can you imagine a photorealistic Jak and Daxter or Sly Cooper! WHOA graphics *_*

lol actually, sly cooper would look super wacky. Imagine real life, but cel-shaded