By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Wii U Has 8 GB of Internal Storage

I saw this as a non-issue last E3, and still people like to bring it up. This solution they went for is what PC makers are using to speed up their computers while keeping competitive prices, having hybrid storing solutions that take the advantages of SSD for fast programs and HDD for massive storage is the best way to go.

And since last year, I already have two more usb HDD. I have at least two other old ones I can use with the Wii U.



@Twitter | Switch | Steam

You say tomato, I say tomato 

"¡Viva la Ñ!"

Around the Network
greenmedic88 said:

The GamePad is not a tablet PC; it's a controller with video/data streaming capabilities. There are a lot of missing components that contribute to the overall cost of tablet PCs from SoC, system memory, local storage, etc. etc. that simply are not in the GamePad. 

As I alway say, I'll wait until iSuppli does its teardown and BoM assessment upon the Wii U's release, but my guess is that the controller will cost less than $100 to produce and assemble. Possibly as low as $60.

If Nintendo goes the MS route of proprietary formatted/packaged, Xbox branded HDDs, then I think there will be legitimate reason for consumers to complain. While it would be a good idea for them to have Nintendo Wii U brand HDDs available for lesser informed consumers, or even just consumers who want matching external HDDs that go with the Wii U design (nothing wrong with that at all) that can easily be picked up at the same retail outlet where the consoles are sold, the option to use an existing HDD is one that I would imagine most buyers would opt for. 

Well, the Wiimote still retails for $30 MSRP ($40 with Wiimote Plus built in), which I'm guessing doesn't cost that much to produce now (or probably even at launch); hopefully they don't markup the price of the GamePad too much. The big three companies make the most off of their accessories, and I'm still guessing that the GamePad is going to cost a good bit more than a Wiimote. I'm thinking it will probably retail for around $70-80 once all is said and done.

If they go the route of proprietary HDDs, I just hope they still allow the use of other HDDs. I think that was one of the best moves on Sony's part this gen, allowing users to put in any internal laptop HDD into their PS3, if they wanted/needed.



MasterVG71782 said:
One of the reasons why 8GB internal storage is crap is because Nintendo has stated they're moving into providing a digital format of all their games. Considering this is a move to HD and we all know the size of games this gen with the PS3/360, 8GB of internal storage won't be enough, especially if people adopt the download-only option of gaming on the Wii U. At the moment, given that there isn't enough information about whether we'll be able to use any single external HDD, 8GB is definitely not enough.

I'm incredibly certain that it's non-proprietary, and likely anything goes as long as its formatted properly.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Maybe Nintendo will allow some kind of cloud storing system?



Nintendo and PC gamer

pezus said:
Barozi said:
kitler53 said:
superchunk said:
Some of you are crazy.

This is a perfect solution and THE best option for consumers.

MOST people won't need more than 8GB and already have quite a few SD cards laying around or would be happy with buying an $10 16GB SD card to pop in there.

Those that will want more storage are by far in the minority and will have no issues spending $50 or a large usb HDD (up to 1TB probably for that price).

This way Nintendo can keep costs low, increase the lifespan of the WiiU, reduce its size, reduce it heat/noise levels, etc etc.

I am really happy with this solution. Especially if WiiU has connectivity to my PC like my PS3 does.... then it really doesn't matter as all my large media content will simply be streamed from the PC to the WiiU. Videos take up the most space anyways.

i completely get your point and overall it is a pretty good one but i still think 8Gb is pretty small.  i can't really determine exactly how much of my harddrive is strictly patches but i'm pretty sure it's over 8 Gb by now.  ..and i just don't see the number and size of patches going down next gen.

but yeah, i completely agree not everyone needs the massive HD i have.  next gen i'm thinking i'll need at least 3-4 Tb to be happy.  i'm at around 400 Gb so far..

Yeah the patches for Battlefield Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 3 alone would fill all of the 8GB already ^^

Or GT5's install...lol

woah woah let's hope there aren't any mandatory installs for the WiiU (don't think so)



Around the Network

Xbox had 10GB right? or was it 20GB.
8GB is seriously Sad for a Next gen console wtf are they thinking.



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

This is perfectly OK with me. I've still got a Gb free on my 3DS, and I've downloaded all 20 Ambassador Games, 4 game demos, 2 video channels, and 5 eShop games, not including the game saves. So having 8x that amount with the option to expand with a Hard Drive (which are dirt cheap and something everyone has) is no issue with me.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

I really don't understand why people are so unhappy about this.

Nintendo provide the minimum they think will be required for basic system functionality (e.g. downloadable demos etc.) and now I have the option of chucking in a 64gb SD ($20), plugging in any one of the number of external hard drives I already have or, if I feel like splashing out, getting a new HDD. All of those solutions are going to be cheaper than Nintendo including either more inbuilt flash or an internal HDD.

If Nintendo turn around and tell people they can only use Nintendo SD cards and Nintendo branded external HDDs then i could understand the moaning. I DO NOT expect them to do this as I can throw whatever SD card I like in my 3DS.



hsrob said:
I'm really don't understand why people are so unhappy about this.

Nintendo provide the minimum they think will be required for basic system functionality (e.g. downloadable demos etc.) and now I have the option of chucking in a 64gb SD ($20), plugging in any one of the number of external hard drives I already have or, if I feel like splashing out, getting a new HDD. All of those solutions are going to be cheaper than Nintendo including either more inbuilt flash or an internal HDD.

If Nintendo turn around and tell people they can only use Nintendo SD cards and Nintendo branded external HDDs then i could understand the moaning. I DO NOT expect them to do this as I can throw whatever SD card I like in my 3DS.


LOL people did moaned about VITA and their proprietary memory cards.

However, I dont think it blew out into a long thread like this.



 

 

Most of these comments read like a storm in a glass of water (IMO).



In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.