Dallinor said:
I have almost no doubt that even if the movie is substantially worse than the first, with the success of the first film behind it and the absolutley massive marketing clout James Cameron can swing behind his movies, a sequel would still make money. Certainly not the record breaking profits of the first, but a lot of money. |
A shoddy sequel might do well ... but it would be a "one-off" and anything following would not fare well. (Though I doubt James Cameron would do "shoddy")
Also, we are already pushing three years since the original film. The sequel is planned for a 2015 release -- six years after the first one. That is twice as long as sequels in the Star Wars universe or Star Trek series (except for natural breaks or reboots). (And the Lord of the Rings series came annually for three years).
In other words, the "buzz" from the original may be long gone and this will have to stand on its own.
Mike from Morgantown
I am Mario. I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble. Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492 NNID: Mike_INTV |