| deskpro2k3 said: ok ok ok. sony copies. but at least they make it better than the original. |
Sorry but the PSP was much better than the vita! :P
miz1q2w3e said:
|
I don't get it.
I make fun of a company for extending the usage of an already ridiculous terminology to new heights of stupidity (doesn't matter what the company is, if it was Sony, Square, Nintendo, Epic, Zynga, whatever, I would make fun of the company for using it, I have always thought the 'AAA' terminology was stupid enough) The thread isn't even to do with how well Microsoft are doing, or an award, or sales figures. Most people in that thread were making fun of the terminology anyway, even though that does not matter.
I come into a thread specifically about Sony's hardware being recognized by an authority on design (or so they claim) and see multiple Nintendo-loyal users come in to ruin and derail the thread, taking as many oppurtunities as they can to proclaim that Sony's hardware does not deserve the recognition, or that Nintendo hardware should have won instead, and engaging in dozens of posts arguing about semantics and contributing nothing to the discussion that could have been created if the thread hadn't been derailed.
No comparison. Absolutely no comparison.
Sal.Paradise said:
I don't get it. I make fun of a company for extending the usage of an already ridiculous terminology to new heights of stupidity (doesn't matter what the company is, if it was Sony, Square, Nintendo, Epic, Zynga, whatever, I would make fun of the company for using it, I have always thought the 'AAA' terminology was stupid enough) The thread isn't even to do with how well Microsoft are doing, or an award, or sales figures. Most people in that thread were making fun of the terminology anyway, even though that does not matter. I come into a thread specifically about Sony's hardware being recognized by an authority on design (or so they claim) and see multiple Nintendo-loyal users come in to ruin and derail the thread, taking as many oppurtunities as they can to proclaim that Sony's hardware does not deserve the recognition, or that Nintendo hardware should have won instead, and engaging in dozens of posts arguing about semantics and contributing nothing to the discussion that could have been created if the thread hadn't been derailed. No comparison. Absolutely no comparison. |
Interesting... Looks like the exact same situation to me
NintendoPie said:
That has to be the worst rule I've ever seen. Why do people take offence to that? |
well remember i said spotted by a mod who are bound by site rules for the most part. most user's wouldn't even bother reporting him(i wouldn't) as it just flows with the conversation putting more fuel on an already over blown fire that could have been avoided if everyone would have taken the award for what it is instead of blowing it way out of proportion.
Sal.Paradise said:
I make fun of a company for extending the usage of an already ridiculous terminology to new heights of stupidity (doesn't matter what the company is, if it was Sony, Square, Nintendo, Epic, Zynga, whatever, I would make fun of the company for using it, I have always thought the 'AAA' terminology was stupid enough) The thread isn't even to do with how well Microsoft are doing, or an award, or sales figures. Most people in that thread were making fun of the terminology anyway, even though that does not matter. I come into a thread specifically about Sony's hardware being recognized by an authority on design (or so they claim) and see multiple Nintendo-loyal users come in to ruin and derail the thread, taking as many oppurtunities as they can to proclaim that Sony's hardware does not deserve the recognition, or that Nintendo hardware should have won instead, and engaging in dozens of posts arguing about semantics and contributing nothing to the discussion that could have been created if the thread hadn't been derailed. No comparison. Absolutely no comparison. |
there are cheap shots taken at the idea of MS claiming thier making a AAAA title (which imo is a rediculous notion anyway), and then you have, people in this thread claiming Vita is just a copy of another product(which near every product is anyway) instead of taking the award for what it is.
i hope that helped.
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
really? no i didn't? i wasn't supose to point that out. look at whats happend in this thread. near everyone including yourself picked a part the context of the article, but would this thread be this popular without all the added links to show what other products got the awards? or pointing out who did what first, although nothing either of them has done is truely that innovative? look back and see some of the post where 1 person said "i just came in here to read an article slowly backs out" cause they knew this would happen, and they avoided it. i didn't come in this thread to correct anyone. i just came in to see how funny it would be to see what i've seen for the past 2 yr.'s on this site, and have herad for the past 7, and beleive me, it wasn't surprsing or funny. it's just plan old, and i'm tiered of seeing it. |
Well then stop coming in here and quoting me. I was done with this thread awhile ago. You win. I don't care anymore.
miz1q2w3e said:
Who's exactly is even claiming this? It was merely stated that Wii was the first to market motion controls to the general public and was the most successful at it. That (in his opinion) makes it deserving of an award, who are you to argue against someone's opinion? |
| MadeInDK said: Vita copied.. touch, cam, ar and gyro, from nintendo.. and sony gets a price.. for 3d display.. Fun world we live in.. |
It won because it had two analog sticks, mark my words. That shit has never been done before.
OT: Congrats to the PSVita. Well deserved in my opinion.
"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian
If someone create a Console where nor Sony Fanboys nor Nintendo Fanboys nor Mic's Fanboys Argued.. then that Person could deserve Nobel Prize for Peace? For having stopped FanboyWars!.. Like Luke Skywalker stopped Star Wars... XD
Jay520 said:
His overall point was that Nintendo consoles should all win awards. It's only logical that every following sentence serves to support his point. If that is true, then he is claiming that the Wii's success contributed to it's right for an innovation award. As such, I acknowledged his mistake. However, if he was simply mentioning the Wii's success with no intention to help prove his point, then the sentence is irrelevant. Either way, that part of his sentence should not be there. I don't see how being successful makes the Wii deserving of an innovation award. Seems illogical to me. Opinions can be illogical. Everyone has a right to an opinion, but they can still be illogical. That's why their called opinions, not fact. As such, it actually makes sense that people argue and discuss opinions. |
Yes it is illogical. I am stupid, forget what I said there is no point to it.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
