By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
miz1q2w3e said:
Jay520 said:
NintendoPie said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
NintendoPie said:

The Wii, DS, and the upcoming Wii U should all win the awards. The DS was the first to market Touch screens and it also had that all new clamshell design with two screens, the Wii was the first to market motion control and is the most succesful, the Wii U's controller conept is very intriguing and can be used in compliment with the games on the big screen.

PS2 did it before Wii. youtube it. and there were other products before PS2 that did motion controles. you're going to have to do better then that.

this stuff has all been repeated before.

i'm sure somebody did touch screen pads other then apple with analog included. don't make me research it. remote play can be done on PSP. 

You missed the part where I said it was the most succesful.


 Success does not contribute to a product's innovation.

Who's exactly is even claiming this? It was merely stated that Wii was the first to market motion controls to the general public and was the most successful at it. That (in his opinion) makes it deserving of an award, who are you to argue against someone's opinion?



His overall point was that Nintendo consoles should all win awards. It's only logical that every following sentence serves to support his point. If that is true, then he is claiming that the Wii's success contributed to it's right for an innovation award. As such, I acknowledged his mistake. However, if he was simply mentioning the Wii's success with no intention to help prove his point, then the sentence is irrelevant. Either way, that part of his sentence should not be there.

I don't see how being successful makes the Wii deserving of an innovation award. Seems illogical to me. Opinions can be illogical. Everyone has a right to an opinion, but they can still be illogical. That's why their called opinions, not fact. As such, it actually makes sense that people argue and discuss opinions.