miz1q2w3e said:
Who's exactly is even claiming this? It was merely stated that Wii was the first to market motion controls to the general public and was the most successful at it. That (in his opinion) makes it deserving of an award, who are you to argue against someone's opinion? |
His overall point was that Nintendo consoles should all win awards. It's only logical that every following sentence serves to support his point. If that is true, then he is claiming that the Wii's success contributed to it's right for an innovation award. As such, I acknowledged his mistake. However, if he was simply mentioning the Wii's success with no intention to help prove his point, then the sentence is irrelevant. Either way, that part of his sentence should not be there.
I don't see how being successful makes the Wii deserving of an innovation award. Seems illogical to me. Opinions can be illogical. Everyone has a right to an opinion, but they can still be illogical. That's why their called opinions, not fact. As such, it actually makes sense that people argue and discuss opinions.