All of them were ports and PC versions were obviously superb. The problem is that the title thread here is trying not to project multiplatform titles instead the exclusives which were better in the graphics section. Please there's no point in carrying an argument which stresses on most multiplaftorm looking better or better gameplay. Battlefield was an impressive feat, never the less better than 360 counterpart.

Killzone 3's co-op campaign isn't as well integrated as Halo's (you can't continue a single player campaign in co-op and vice versa, you have to start again), and it's only 2 player where Halo and Gears are 4 player.

Also Forza does have a more diverse car list. If you crunch the numbers, Forza 4 has more cars from every region except Japan. GT5 makes the 1,000 car list (800 standard resolution) by making a lot of repeats, and using cars that are nearly identical. I recall there are close to 150 Nissans, and only really 30 of them are mechanically different. The Honda S2000 specifically has 13 models in GT5, only 4 mechanically different, and even then, sometimes barely (Forza 4 has 1 S2000, and I think only 30 Nissans or so, all very different).

Anyway...this is off topic. If we start debating quality.....this will never end (like like Best graphics was going to end).

I said this before, and many people agreed, but people kept arguing. Graphics are subjective, to some people Forza will be the best looking game because of the most evolved and realistic lighting engine, however there is no water in the game, and very little to model. To others it will be Uncharted 3 because of the sand and vegetation animations. Others will like Gears 3 for the high texture detail, etc.

No I'm agreeing with you. tired of Sony fans always putting down the 360 when in reality, the systems are very similar. Most of the games are MP, and they have about the same # of exclusives (most of 360's pre 2009, most of PS3 post 2009).

People who really argue one system over the other really have no life and should open themselves up. PS3 and 360 both have great exclusives in every genre, racing, shooter, RPG, etc. Oh what a better world this place would be if GT5 fans played Forza, and if Halo fans played Killzone.

but but but Why are doing something like this http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4476099???

He thinks GT5>Forza 4. It his opinion? so what's the problem with it. I thought you don't have any trouble in accepting one's opinion??

Well, this thread sure has been an emotional roller coaster for u. I'm saying you have an opinion and that's fine. Aldro has simply highlighted why that might be flawed, and I agree with him. Anyway, whatever we may say I doubt there will ever be a universal agreement here. This thread has gone on for far too long now. Should just end it here. Your forza, gt5 car argument is interesting btw.

Agreed good points.

The "CELL" is a processor, not a graphics processor.  If the PS3 struggled with the most CPU intensive game in recent date: Skyrim.  Then the cell isn't really helping.  You're ignoring that both consoles have nearly identical graphic processors and the same exact amount of RAM.

All opinions.  I can point out quite a bit in Red Dead Redemption that makes Uncharted look like a Joke.