Gilgamesh said:
errorpwns said:
Chark said:
This is still going on? Both consoles look great. PS3 has more graphical potential than 360 but its not always taken advantage of. This difference can be hard to tell apart with an untrained eye and especially by those who don't play both systems or the games that specifically show graphically achievement. Multiplatform games are not a valid argument except for those games, because often times the difference has everything to do with developer, not the hardware. If you really want the best graphics in your games, then buy both systems and take advantage of the multiplatform difference, while still having the exclusive glory of each. |
Where did you hear this bullock? The PS3 and Xbox 360 share the same Memory/Graphics limitations. Neither console can actually "best" the other at raw graphics power. If Microsoft had first party developers that can fool people into believing their game is better by using cheap motion tricks, the Xbox 360 would have the "best" graphics of this generation.
|
You sir are completely ignoring the power of the CELL.
|
The "CELL" is a processor, not a graphics processor. If the PS3 struggled with the most CPU intensive game in recent date: Skyrim. Then the cell isn't really helping. You're ignoring that both consoles have nearly identical graphic processors and the same exact amount of RAM.
