The longer, the better!

If I was Nintendo, I wouldn't release it until around April, doesn't make any "business" sense to release in Feb. Software sells Hardware, especially this game. Logic says release it when we have systems to sell.

 Thank God you're not Nintendo.

Hell, I think Nintendo should release Brawl in July of '09, because it's highly likely they'll have a HUGE stock by then.

Screw the fans, they're not gonna get pissed at Nintendo for the delaying the game multiple times, nope. 

I'm pretty sure if Nintendo delayed this game past March, they'd get a ton of negative press.

Would you want it sooner, being of lesser quality, with more glitches, and such, or later, being of higher quality, with less glitches, and such? Perhaps it might be better to just wait a little bit longer, rather than to have the developers rush the game, for a sooner release date. Look at Sonic Adventure. It was rushed, and could have been better if its release date was pushed back. It could have ran at a solid, smooth, 60 frames per second, and have far, less glitches, than it does now. It's always better not to rush games, for the longer it takes to make a game, the better it will be. The game will exist forever after the release date, so extended time before the release date is almost meaningless.