By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Star Wars Kinect Looks Beyond Terrible

Tagged games:

Salnax on 27 January 2012
VGKing said:
It's obviously meant to be played by kids.
Not sure kids are big Star Wars fans though.


The Cartoon Network series as of late has its fans. But kids don't deserve bad games.



My friend is a Vtuber, check him out.

Around the Network
Carl on 27 January 2012
VGKing said:
It's obviously meant to be played by kids.
Not sure kids are big Star Wars fans though.

Kids love Star Wars, but the core Star Wars fanbase is obviously not children.

Just because it's aimed at children though, doesn't mean it has to be a shitty game. Look at the LEGO Star Wars games for example. They're brilliant.



                            

oniyide on 27 January 2012
killerzX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


i think its worth it becuase you get what you pay for, better online, voice chat, xbla, youtube, netflix.

QUE?? better online is debatable, (its better than WiiWare for sure), voice chat; they all have voic chat, you must mean cross game chat, at least I hope you mean that and if you do. got me there.  Youtube and Netfilx are FREE services across the board, please tell me that is not one of the reasons you are paying for LIVE when its free everywhere else



Carl on 27 January 2012

This thread isn't a PSN vs Live thread.

Take that shit elsewhere.



                            

o_O.Q on 27 January 2012
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


the video was only uploaded today though



Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. on 27 January 2012
oniyide said:
killerzX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


i think its worth it becuase you get what you pay for, better online, voice chat, xbla, youtube, netflix.

QUE?? better online is debatable, (its better than WiiWare for sure), voice chat; they all have voic chat, you must mean cross game chat, at least I hope you mean that and if you do. got me there.  Youtube and Netfilx are FREE services across the board, please tell me that is not one of the reasons you are paying for LIVE when its free everywhere else


That was my kill buddy.lol



oniyide on 27 January 2012
S.T.A.G.E. said:
oniyide said:
killerzX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


i think its worth it becuase you get what you pay for, better online, voice chat, xbla, youtube, netflix.

QUE?? better online is debatable, (its better than WiiWare for sure), voice chat; they all have voic chat, you must mean cross game chat, at least I hope you mean that and if you do. got me there.  Youtube and Netfilx are FREE services across the board, please tell me that is not one of the reasons you are paying for LIVE when its free everywhere else


That was my kill buddy.lol

LOL, sorry. Sometimes you just see something so blatantly wrong, you just have to correct it on the spot. ANd im not trying to turn this into a PSN vs. LIVE, hell I didnt even say PSN. LOL



SvennoJ on 27 January 2012

That link doesn't work, I get this video has been removed by the user. Was it that bad?



S.T.A.G.E. on 27 January 2012
oniyide said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
oniyide said:
killerzX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


i think its worth it becuase you get what you pay for, better online, voice chat, xbla, youtube, netflix.

QUE?? better online is debatable, (its better than WiiWare for sure), voice chat; they all have voic chat, you must mean cross game chat, at least I hope you mean that and if you do. got me there.  Youtube and Netfilx are FREE services across the board, please tell me that is not one of the reasons you are paying for LIVE when its free everywhere else


That was my kill buddy.lol

LOL, sorry. Sometimes you just see something so blatantly wrong, you just have to correct it on the spot. ANd im not trying to turn this into a PSN vs. LIVE, hell I didnt even say PSN. LOL

A correction is a correction. I'll give credit where it is due, lol.



oniyide on 27 January 2012
S.T.A.G.E. said:
oniyide said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
oniyide said:
killerzX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


i think its worth it becuase you get what you pay for, better online, voice chat, xbla, youtube, netflix.

QUE?? better online is debatable, (its better than WiiWare for sure), voice chat; they all have voic chat, you must mean cross game chat, at least I hope you mean that and if you do. got me there.  Youtube and Netfilx are FREE services across the board, please tell me that is not one of the reasons you are paying for LIVE when its free everywhere else


That was my kill buddy.lol

LOL, sorry. Sometimes you just see something so blatantly wrong, you just have to correct it on the spot. ANd im not trying to turn this into a PSN vs. LIVE, hell I didnt even say PSN. LOL

A correction is a correction. I'll give credit where it is due, lol.


thanks, wont speak on it no more. I dont want to derail the thread