By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Star Wars Kinect Looks Beyond Terrible

Tagged games:

thismeintiel on 27 January 2012

What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.



 

Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. on 27 January 2012
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 



killerzX on 27 January 2012

that just look disapointing, really got my hopes up. i was really looking forward to this game, and kinects potential.
unfortunately it looks like it will not come to be.

i remember several months back numerous fans were praising this game, and saying it would be great (i think selnor, michael5 were among them), and that got me really excited for it, but not any more.

i wish they would make a Move starwars game, it seems like the perfect fit.



thismeintiel on 27 January 2012
killerzX said:
that just look disapointing, really got my hopes up. i was really looking forward to this game, and kinects potential.
unfortunately it looks like it will not come to be.

i remember several months back numerous fans were praising this game, and saying it would be great (i think selnor, michael5 were among them), and that got me really excited for it, but not any more.

i wish they would make a Move starwars game, it seems like the perfect fit.

Definitely.  Controlling the lightsaber 1:1 while also being able to control your character's movement.  That would have been awesome.



 

Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 on 27 January 2012
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


Aside from its numerous features I only pay for Xbox Live gold because I like its very sociable community. I mean, in almost every match in BF3 or COD I can find parties who plays together and sticks together more than what I can find in other services. 

And yeah, thats about it. It may not sound like much but thats the reason why I pay for it. 

Also minecraft.



Yay!!!

Around the Network
Jay520 on 27 January 2012

Don't give them their props just yet. Even average games are beyond terrible. We will have to wait and see if it turns out to be an actually good game.



killerzX on 27 January 2012
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


i think its worth it becuase you get what you pay for, better online, voice chat, xbla, youtube, netflix.



S.T.A.G.E. on 27 January 2012
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


Aside from its numerous features I only pay for Xbox Live gold because I like its very sociable community. I mean, in almost every match in BF3 or COD I can find parties who plays together and sticks together more than what I can find in other services. 

And yeah, thats about it. It may not sound like much but thats the reason why I pay for it. 

Also minecraft.

 

I'll message you if you want to have this debate (as to not throw off the topic any further...I was just venting). Its a losing one if this is what you're going to write.... oohhhhh  of this I am sure.



S.T.A.G.E. on 27 January 2012
killerzX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
thismeintiel said:
What's even more terrible is the view count. You'd think that something officially from MS would at least garner a few thousand views. Yet, most of their vids have less than 1,000.


Well...it is a secondary viewing channel. These videos are majorly seen on Xbox Live. This brings me to another point, if Xbox Live videos are visible on Youtube and are official to Microsoft what the hell are gamers paying $60 a year for, outside of paying Activision to play Call of Duty online? 


i think its worth it becuase you get what you pay for, better online, voice chat, xbla, youtube, netflix.


Two responses for the price of one comment. I'll message you as well.



VGKing on 27 January 2012

It's obviously meant to be played by kids.
Not sure kids are big Star Wars fans though.