No multiplayer? Yay.

:/ It's parody of the fixation on ratings as determining anything relevant about a game

Why do people still think this is Naughty Dogs first M rated game? Way of the Warrior says hello. It might not be a "M" rating but it is 17+

Rainbird said: Spedfrom said: Rainbird said: Spedfrom said: Rainbird said: I think this could be both a good sign or a bad sign. The good way is that it could make for an excellent singleplayer campaign. The bad way is that, if they do a singleplayer campaign in the vein of Uncharted (extremely linear), the game might end up being uninteresting after a playthrough. So here's hoping the game will be something more open, full of environments that beg to be explored! But, either way, I'm not getting excited before we see some gameplay. I've replayed Uncharted 1 and 2 at least 3 times each. If I recall correctly U1 was played by me 5 times in total and U2 3 or 4, I can't remember for sure. And I've seen a great number of people report the same thing, that the games are very replayable and people actually do replay them a lot for the story and for the gameplay. I've yet to play U3 for some very specific but unrelated reasons. I've replayed them U1 and U2 a few times as well, though only for trophies, and from a value point of view, I wasn't terribly impressed. It's the same reason why I haven't played Uncharted 3 yet. I know I'm just going to play the SP once or twice, and at full retail price, that's just not worth my time. Give me games like the new Batman games, where I can roam a world full of things worth exploring for. Or games like Heavy Rain and Mass Effect, where I can twist the story and feel like I'm making my own decisions. That's what I want! A multiplayer gamer would tell you that those games don't impress him and he just wants to shoot dudes in the face and if a game has no multiplayer, open world or not, he doesn't care. That's what he wants! Which brings me to my point: there are audiences for all types of games and I'm glad Naughty Dog is making this type of game because I'm its type of audience. I'm aware that there's an audience who loves the Uncharted-model. I'm also aware that there's an audience who wants something else. My original post is simply me expressing my point of view over what this news might mean for the game, relative to what I hope it becomes. If your hopes are different than mine, then that's fine, I'm not trying to make you feel the same way I do.  My point is simply this: If it's going for the same level of value as an Uncharted-game without multiplayer, then I will be disappointed.

Ok, I see what you mean and I can accept that. I'll be on the other side of the fence though. ;)

i will be looking out for this, last of us and twisted metal confirmed for 2012. wonder what other exclusive titles will release on ps3

Glad to hear it.

STARHAWK!!!!! which is AWESOME btw ..oh and Yakuza of the End! and possibly nin no kuni and TLG

OT: I really don't care about ratings :S they do nothing for me...I enjoy stabbing suckas in the eye in KZ3 just as much getting a kick off on UC3. it means aboslutely nothing. However a survival horror type game without M would have been a bit weird. 

i wish this game had co op tho..would have been sweeeet

I usually don't play games like this but damn :S can't ,miss out on a ND game

i forgot about starhawk, yakuza is a deffo buy for me also theres always much games to choose from on ps3 rather than have 2 or 3 exclusives to choose from

yep exactly...and I forgot Journey and Sly also...and I'm sure I'm forgetting more and chances are they will announce at least one more game :S

oh and maybe Dust will release next year too :S 

 find it funny at times when ppl say that the competitions approach of fewer games is a good thing..as a consumer wtf would we care about what's good for them? having more games is a definitely a great thing for me...i mean even with TLOU everyone were saying ND will hopefully do a new ip next and BAM .here ya go folks..new Ip...new genre to us...your welcome.