Turkish said: Just got a warning for my sig because apparantly its too big, I went to forum rules but nowhere does it say how big it should be. And other moderators didnot have a problem with it for a while now. I just compared my sig to Seece's on my monitor and they're both the same length. |
your sig looks fine to me idk if you just changed it though, theres also some variations of there lengths if using different web browsers from what i remember
seeces is definitely larger and i believe it would of crossed the threshold when we had the one line post length rule
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4312607
its definitely plausible that theres issues on here with bans being unfair ect, but that could be said on every site, things like this arent perfect and should never be taking personal with the mods themselves. as i learned over the yrs its not there fault its the posters fault the ones that report minor infractions
in the end if you dont want to get banned do what go with no sig and limit posts
i agree with ethomaz things got seriouz on here, you cant say fanboy you can say undertrackz ect. what really pisses me off is what if adjustments occur for the SW and HW that these posters said under or overtracked they dont get no apology, they dont get there mod history fixed. in 07 to early 09 the site had more freedom and there would be more lol threads posters like leo j, crazzyman, rock on 2007, megaman on others really built the forums on here, i myself recognized this faster than others right around mid 09 rather than fall in the traps of the new rules as my fellow brethren, i choose to reduce forum activity instead and by the look of forum activity and unique threads created it looks like others have too
so at the end of the day these said posters that report for minor infractions will indeed "weed out" the so called trolls/fanboys but what they forget is what will they be occupied with once all these member leave and get permabanned?