BenKenobi88 said:
They ban breeds of dogs? I'm sorry, but that's just stupid... I don't really like pitbulls, but seriously...if someone's going to have a crazy dog, the breed isn't really an issue...there's lots of crazy dog breeds out there. |
As an Ontarian; the province pitbulls were banned in, I'll speak to that. It's actually a fairly complex issue, and has been the subject of much debate in several countries. infact, here's a list of countries, regions and cities that have banned certain breeds of pit bulls.
Place | Ban Status |
Springville, Utah[2] | Active |
Council Bluffs, Iowa[3] | Active: 2004 |
Royal City, Washington[4] | Active: 12 Jan, 2007 |
Denver, Colorado[5] | Active: Banned on 9 May, 2005 (first banned in 1980's) |
Ontario, Canada[6] | Active: Banned on 15 October, 2004 |
Winnipeg, Canada[7] | Active: Banned in 1990 |
Prince George's County, Maryland[8] | Active: 1996 |
Shelbyville, California[9] | Proposed: 18 November, 2006 |
New York City, NY[10] | Proposed: 28 December 2006 |
Aurora, Colorado[11] | Proposed: 27 September, 2005 |
Oklahoma[12] | Proposed 21 June, 2005 |
Youngstown, Ohio[13] | Proposed: 10 January, 1999 |
Bronx, NY[citation needed] | Active: Banned on 17 January, 2007 |
Richland, Washington[4] | Proposed: 21 December, 2006 |
Tupelo, Mississippi[14] | Proposed: 28 September, 2006 |
Harlem, NY[citation needed] | Active: Banned on 11 January, 2007 |
Parker, Colorado[15] | Proposed: 17 January, 2006 |
Queens, NY[citation needed] | Active: Banned on 8 December, 2005 |
Chicago, Illinois[16] | Proposed: 17 November, 2005 |
Yonkers, NY | Active: Banned on 3 November, 2006 |
France[17] | Active: April 30, 1999; Ownership restricted; non-pure-breed animals resembling pit-bulls are to be surgically neutered |
Norway | Most Pit Bull variants are illegal since ca. 1980, dogs older than that were allowed to stay with their owners until a natural death. |
United Kingdom[18] | Active: 12 August, 1991 (Banned in public places, under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991) |
In Ontario, It became a pretty major issue after a string of Pitbull attacks in the province, including at least one child killed. That's what put it in the public sphere. As for the actual rational behind it, there's differing views. Some studies have shown pit bulls are dramatically more likely to bite than other breeds. Certain bans have had some success in lowering dog attacks. Some, like Winnipeg, have not.
Part of the reasoning behind it comes from the fact that pit bulls have been bred over the years specifically for aggression. Yes, a dog is more likely to be violent if it has a crappy owner. But evidence suggests that the effect is multiplied when it's a pit bull. Of course there's also evidence to suggest thats hogwash. It's still pretty early in the pitbull scientific debate realm.
I'm not sure where I fall on the argument. Mostly just because there isn't a scientific concensus on the dog's likely hood of attacks, and because it's too early to tell just how well, if at all, these bans work in the long term.
I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do.
Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.
Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!
Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.