By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - So, VGChartz was actually mentioned in other places!!

thismeintiel said:
flashfire926 said:

Completely agreed.

Agree, too. I'm a huge PS and ND fan. I've bought every one of their games, but after that vid, I'm done with ND. I'm kinda wondering if Amy Henning being let go had to do with her not agreeing with the agenda. Or at the very least, not agreeing with making it a big focus going forward.

@ OP

Well, VGC has a big plus going for it in that the mods admitted that they should have handled it better and explained themselves. Only be worried if they fail to do so in the future. 

Shouldn't you give up on sony all together based on your own very logic? Namely with statements like this: http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2018/07/sony_we_need_to_cater_to_all_people_regardless_of_age_gender_sexual_orientation_ethnicity_or_belief

“We need to cater to all kinds of people, whatever the age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or belief,” he said. “As we provide an experience to game players to become a hero or heroine to do amazing things in our games, it is good to try to create protagonists that people of different backgrounds could associate with.”



 

Around the Network
quickrick said:
Torillian said:

That's where your suspension of disbelief ends? Nevermind that characters in Uncharted can kill swarms of bad guys without much issue and take shots but heal up by hiding for a couple seconds, but a woman beating two dudes is just too crazy for you to chalk up to "well it's a video game not built around realism so w/e". Out of curiosity, would your preferred end to that sequence be that she gets captured or killed because a woman can never overpower two dudes, or perhaps it's more fun to have an unrealistic sequence in an already unrealistic game.

I think its just about showing off female superiority, especially after watching the agenda videos. nathan drake is supposed to be the hero of the game, killed thousands of men, yet he doesn't even hold a candle compared Nadine, she beats him up like he's a joke.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheWorfEffect

Could just be lazy writing rather than an agenda for female empowerment over the patriarchy, then again their alignment with Anita is pretty damning from the off in my eyes, that woman is poison to all she can lay her hands on.

But yeah the trope of showing the audience how strong a new character is by having them beat up someone the audience knows to be very strong, it goes back decades.

 

Love where that effect got the name too.... Worf literally a bag of muscles on the Bridge of the Enterprise who's sole role is to get thrown across the set when each new villain is revealed to be strong.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Ganoncrotch said:
quickrick said:

I think its just about showing off female superiority, especially after watching the agenda videos. nathan drake is supposed to be the hero of the game, killed thousands of men, yet he doesn't even hold a candle compared Nadine, she beats him up like he's a joke.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheWorfEffect

Could just be lazy writing rather than an agenda for female empowerment over the patriarchy, then again their alignment with Anita is pretty damning from the off in my eyes, that woman is poison to all she can lay her hands on.

But yeah the trope of showing the audience how strong a new character is by having them beat up someone the audience knows to be very strong, it goes back decades.

 

Love where that effect got the name too.... Worf literally a bag of muscles on the Bridge of the Enterprise who's sole role is to get thrown across the set when each new villain is revealed to be strong.

She even complains about the last of us, cause joel has to help ellie with the crates in the water, its makes woman look weak according to her. The president of naughty really supporting her like that is really sad, makes me not even wanna play their games anymore. 



Between "SJWs" and "Anti-SJWs", I feel like I'm watching the stupid olympics.

I wasn't even invited.



Not sure why you're giving attention to Gamer Gaters and Status Quo Warriors. I mean geez, look at the name of the site, it's right in the title. Almost everyone that uses the term SJW is a warrior themselves, just for the status quo instead of social justice. It's getting to the point that people are taking a militant attitude towards any sign of giving a shit about anything about fairness in society for any non-majority group. How dare I care about gay people! The audacity! Except it goes further than that even, to the point where if there's a woman or a black person in a game, especially a major role, the SQWs cry SJW. It's laughable really. They don't deserve our attention.



Around the Network

Vgcartz used to be super popular. It was even on Yahoo's home page back in the day. Then, somewhere along the way, it just lost its influence.



i think the moderation here is great and allows for a fairly wide set of perspectives and as far as i remember the op asked for that thread to be locked



LudicrousSpeed said:
That thread being locked was silly. There wasn’t anything negative or personal being done in there, it was actually some pretty civil back and forth going on. Not surprised some people took the thread being locked as a sign of censorship and bias.

the op requested that the thread be locked



HylianSwordsman said:
Not sure why you're giving attention to Gamer Gaters and Status Quo Warriors. I mean geez, look at the name of the site, it's right in the title. Almost everyone that uses the term SJW is a warrior themselves, just for the status quo instead of social justice. It's getting to the point that people are taking a militant attitude towards any sign of giving a shit about anything about fairness in society for any non-majority group. How dare I care about gay people! The audacity! Except it goes further than that even, to the point where if there's a woman or a black person in a game, especially a major role, the SQWs cry SJW. It's laughable really. They don't deserve our attention.

 

"Almost everyone that uses the term SJW is a warrior themselves, just for the status quo instead of social justice."

or for common sense and reason

i mean the people fighting against the notion that they're no biological differences between the sexes are not so much status quo warriors as they are anti-delusion warriors

Last edited by o_O.Q - on 07 July 2018

Acevil said:
thismeintiel said:

Agree, too. I'm a huge PS and ND fan. I've bought every one of their games, but after that vid, I'm done with ND. I'm kinda wondering if Amy Henning being let go had to do with her not agreeing with the agenda. Or at the very least, not agreeing with making it a big focus going forward.

@ OP

Well, VGC has a big plus going for it in that the mods admitted that they should have handled it better and explained themselves. Only be worried if they fail to do so in the future. 

Shouldn't you give up on sony all together based on your own very logic? Namely with statements like this: http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2018/07/sony_we_need_to_cater_to_all_people_regardless_of_age_gender_sexual_orientation_ethnicity_or_belief

“We need to cater to all kinds of people, whatever the age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or belief,” he said. “As we provide an experience to game players to become a hero or heroine to do amazing things in our games, it is good to try to create protagonists that people of different backgrounds could associate with.”

It isn't wrong to cater to different demographics but the way Naughty Dog is going for it should be criticised and their games boycotted. Ah well, their games were overrated anyways. Sony has better devs like Sony Santa Monica, Sucker Punch, Polyphony, Guerilla Games and Media Molecule.